At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Experience the convenience of getting accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
To determine the relationship between the number of calories in a meal and the cost of the meal, we need to calculate the correlation coefficient and examine its magnitude and direction. Here is the step-by-step solution:
1. Data Collection
- Number of calories in meals: 550, 1250, 780, 650
- Cost of meals: \[tex]$12, \$[/tex]11, \[tex]$13, \$[/tex]10
2. Calculate the Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient quantifies the degree to which two variables are related. Based on calculations, the correlation coefficient turns out to be -0.129.
3. Interpret the Correlation Coefficient
- Magnitude and Strength: The absolute value of the correlation coefficient (0.129) is less than 0.7, indicating a weak correlation.
- Direction: The sign of the correlation coefficient is negative (-0.129), indicating that as the number of calories increases, the cost of the meal tends to decrease, albeit very slightly.
4. Conclusion
The best description for the strength of the model, considering the data provided, is that there is a weak negative correlation.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
a weak negative correlation.
1. Data Collection
- Number of calories in meals: 550, 1250, 780, 650
- Cost of meals: \[tex]$12, \$[/tex]11, \[tex]$13, \$[/tex]10
2. Calculate the Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient quantifies the degree to which two variables are related. Based on calculations, the correlation coefficient turns out to be -0.129.
3. Interpret the Correlation Coefficient
- Magnitude and Strength: The absolute value of the correlation coefficient (0.129) is less than 0.7, indicating a weak correlation.
- Direction: The sign of the correlation coefficient is negative (-0.129), indicating that as the number of calories increases, the cost of the meal tends to decrease, albeit very slightly.
4. Conclusion
The best description for the strength of the model, considering the data provided, is that there is a weak negative correlation.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
a weak negative correlation.
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.