When reviewing state laws mandating age requirements for purchasing cigarettes, they undergo strict scrutiny to ensure constitutional validity. Strict scrutiny demands a compelling government interest and the least restrictive means to justify such laws, safeguarding fundamental rights.
When a state law that mandates a specific age requirement to purchase cigarettes is being reviewed concerning its constitutionality, it would likely undergo strict scrutiny. Strict scrutiny is applied when a law inhibits a fundamental constitutional right, requiring the government to prove a compelling government interest and showing that the law is the least restrictive means possible to achieve the goal.
For instance, laws that restrict the purchase of cigarettes to individuals above a certain age are considered discriminatory but can be justified under certain circumstances if the government can demonstrate a compelling reason for the restriction and that it is the least extreme measure available. This high level of scrutiny ensures that fundamental rights are adequately protected and upheld in the legal system.
https://brainly.com/question/14867447
