Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Experience the convenience of getting accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
To determine the correct conclusion from the two-sample t-test conducted to compare the eating habits (total calories consumed) of students from two universities, follow these steps:
1. State the Null and Alternative Hypotheses:
- Null Hypothesis (H0): μ1 = μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from both universities is the same.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): μ1 < μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from University 1 (Sample 1) is less than that for University 2 (Sample 2).
2. Given Information:
- Sample 1: n1 = 60, mean1 = 985, sd1 = 8.7
- Sample 2: n2 = 55, mean2 = 1300, sd2 = 9.6
- Test statistic (t) = 3.2
- P-value = 0.0009
3. Significance Level:
- Commonly used significance level (α) = 0.05
4. Decision Rule:
- If the P-value is less than the significance level (α), we reject the null hypothesis.
- If the P-value is greater than or equal to the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
5. Compare the P-value with the Significance Level:
- P-value = 0.0009
- Significance level (α) = 0.05
Since 0.0009 < 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
6. Conclusion:
Rejecting the null hypothesis provides sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Therefore, the correct conclusion is:
- The samples provide significant evidence that students from Sample 1 are eating less than students from Sample 2.
1. State the Null and Alternative Hypotheses:
- Null Hypothesis (H0): μ1 = μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from both universities is the same.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): μ1 < μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from University 1 (Sample 1) is less than that for University 2 (Sample 2).
2. Given Information:
- Sample 1: n1 = 60, mean1 = 985, sd1 = 8.7
- Sample 2: n2 = 55, mean2 = 1300, sd2 = 9.6
- Test statistic (t) = 3.2
- P-value = 0.0009
3. Significance Level:
- Commonly used significance level (α) = 0.05
4. Decision Rule:
- If the P-value is less than the significance level (α), we reject the null hypothesis.
- If the P-value is greater than or equal to the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
5. Compare the P-value with the Significance Level:
- P-value = 0.0009
- Significance level (α) = 0.05
Since 0.0009 < 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
6. Conclusion:
Rejecting the null hypothesis provides sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Therefore, the correct conclusion is:
- The samples provide significant evidence that students from Sample 1 are eating less than students from Sample 2.
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.