Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
To determine the correct conclusion from the two-sample t-test conducted to compare the eating habits (total calories consumed) of students from two universities, follow these steps:
1. State the Null and Alternative Hypotheses:
- Null Hypothesis (H0): μ1 = μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from both universities is the same.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): μ1 < μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from University 1 (Sample 1) is less than that for University 2 (Sample 2).
2. Given Information:
- Sample 1: n1 = 60, mean1 = 985, sd1 = 8.7
- Sample 2: n2 = 55, mean2 = 1300, sd2 = 9.6
- Test statistic (t) = 3.2
- P-value = 0.0009
3. Significance Level:
- Commonly used significance level (α) = 0.05
4. Decision Rule:
- If the P-value is less than the significance level (α), we reject the null hypothesis.
- If the P-value is greater than or equal to the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
5. Compare the P-value with the Significance Level:
- P-value = 0.0009
- Significance level (α) = 0.05
Since 0.0009 < 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
6. Conclusion:
Rejecting the null hypothesis provides sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Therefore, the correct conclusion is:
- The samples provide significant evidence that students from Sample 1 are eating less than students from Sample 2.
1. State the Null and Alternative Hypotheses:
- Null Hypothesis (H0): μ1 = μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from both universities is the same.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): μ1 < μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from University 1 (Sample 1) is less than that for University 2 (Sample 2).
2. Given Information:
- Sample 1: n1 = 60, mean1 = 985, sd1 = 8.7
- Sample 2: n2 = 55, mean2 = 1300, sd2 = 9.6
- Test statistic (t) = 3.2
- P-value = 0.0009
3. Significance Level:
- Commonly used significance level (α) = 0.05
4. Decision Rule:
- If the P-value is less than the significance level (α), we reject the null hypothesis.
- If the P-value is greater than or equal to the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
5. Compare the P-value with the Significance Level:
- P-value = 0.0009
- Significance level (α) = 0.05
Since 0.0009 < 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
6. Conclusion:
Rejecting the null hypothesis provides sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Therefore, the correct conclusion is:
- The samples provide significant evidence that students from Sample 1 are eating less than students from Sample 2.
Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.