Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine the correct conclusion from the two-sample t-test conducted to compare the eating habits (total calories consumed) of students from two universities, follow these steps:
1. State the Null and Alternative Hypotheses:
- Null Hypothesis (H0): μ1 = μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from both universities is the same.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): μ1 < μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from University 1 (Sample 1) is less than that for University 2 (Sample 2).
2. Given Information:
- Sample 1: n1 = 60, mean1 = 985, sd1 = 8.7
- Sample 2: n2 = 55, mean2 = 1300, sd2 = 9.6
- Test statistic (t) = 3.2
- P-value = 0.0009
3. Significance Level:
- Commonly used significance level (α) = 0.05
4. Decision Rule:
- If the P-value is less than the significance level (α), we reject the null hypothesis.
- If the P-value is greater than or equal to the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
5. Compare the P-value with the Significance Level:
- P-value = 0.0009
- Significance level (α) = 0.05
Since 0.0009 < 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
6. Conclusion:
Rejecting the null hypothesis provides sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Therefore, the correct conclusion is:
- The samples provide significant evidence that students from Sample 1 are eating less than students from Sample 2.
1. State the Null and Alternative Hypotheses:
- Null Hypothesis (H0): μ1 = μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from both universities is the same.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): μ1 < μ2, indicating that the mean calorie consumption for students from University 1 (Sample 1) is less than that for University 2 (Sample 2).
2. Given Information:
- Sample 1: n1 = 60, mean1 = 985, sd1 = 8.7
- Sample 2: n2 = 55, mean2 = 1300, sd2 = 9.6
- Test statistic (t) = 3.2
- P-value = 0.0009
3. Significance Level:
- Commonly used significance level (α) = 0.05
4. Decision Rule:
- If the P-value is less than the significance level (α), we reject the null hypothesis.
- If the P-value is greater than or equal to the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
5. Compare the P-value with the Significance Level:
- P-value = 0.0009
- Significance level (α) = 0.05
Since 0.0009 < 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
6. Conclusion:
Rejecting the null hypothesis provides sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Therefore, the correct conclusion is:
- The samples provide significant evidence that students from Sample 1 are eating less than students from Sample 2.
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.