Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Complete this assessment to review what you've learned. It will not count toward your grade.

Which of the following defines judicial restraint?

A. The idea that judges should not rule on matters of the constitutionality of the actions of the executive or legislative branch.

B. A landmark Supreme Court case that established the doctrine of separate but equal within all public spaces.

C. An interpretation of the law that uses ordinary language when language is unclear in the Constitution or ruling of a case.

D. The ruling on laws based on political or personal views that lead to a preferred or desired outcome regardless of the law.


Sagot :

Final answer:

Judicial restraint in judicial interpretation encourages judges to limit their power by only striking down laws if clearly unconstitutional, emphasizing respect for precedent and legislative deference.


Explanation:

Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that emphasizes judges limiting the exercise of their power, only striking down laws if clearly unconstitutional. This approach contrasts with judicial activism and involves respecting established precedent and deferring to the legislature.


Learn more about Judicial Restraint here:

https://brainly.com/question/29545866


Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.