Welcome to Westonci.ca, your ultimate destination for finding answers to a wide range of questions from experts. Discover the answers you need from a community of experts ready to help you with their knowledge and experience in various fields. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Judicial restraint in judicial interpretation encourages judges to limit their power by only striking down laws if clearly unconstitutional, emphasizing respect for precedent and legislative deference.
Explanation:
Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that emphasizes judges limiting the exercise of their power, only striking down laws if clearly unconstitutional. This approach contrasts with judicial activism and involves respecting established precedent and deferring to the legislature.
Learn more about Judicial Restraint here:
https://brainly.com/question/29545866
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.