Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Judicial restraint in judicial interpretation encourages judges to limit their power by only striking down laws if clearly unconstitutional, emphasizing respect for precedent and legislative deference.
Explanation:
Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that emphasizes judges limiting the exercise of their power, only striking down laws if clearly unconstitutional. This approach contrasts with judicial activism and involves respecting established precedent and deferring to the legislature.
Learn more about Judicial Restraint here:
https://brainly.com/question/29545866
Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.