Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Judicial restraint in judicial interpretation encourages judges to limit their power by only striking down laws if clearly unconstitutional, emphasizing respect for precedent and legislative deference.
Explanation:
Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that emphasizes judges limiting the exercise of their power, only striking down laws if clearly unconstitutional. This approach contrasts with judicial activism and involves respecting established precedent and deferring to the legislature.
Learn more about Judicial Restraint here:
https://brainly.com/question/29545866
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.