Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Join our Q&A platform and connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions in various areas. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

David is writing a response to an op-ed in his school newspaper with which he initially agreed. However, during his research, he found compelling evidence that made him change his position. What should he do next?

A. Write a strong rebuttal to the new evidence.
B. Use the new evidence from his research as counterarguments.
C. Set the new evidence aside and focus on finding facts to support the op-ed's claim.
D. Present the new evidence and old evidence and let readers decide which one they agree with.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

David should present both the new and old evidence to let readers decide.


Explanation:

David should present the new evidence and old evidence and let readers decide which one they agree with. By doing this, he can acknowledge and address the compelling evidence that made him change his position. It allows for a comprehensive discussion where both sides are considered.


Learn more about Changing opinions based on evidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/10434314


Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.