Answered

Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Find reliable answers to your questions from a wide community of knowledgeable experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

David is writing a response to an op-ed in his school newspaper with which he initially agreed. However, during his research, he found compelling evidence that made him change his position. What should he do next?

A. Write a strong rebuttal to the new evidence.
B. Use the new evidence from his research as counterarguments.
C. Set the new evidence aside and focus on finding facts to support the op-ed's claim.
D. Present the new evidence and old evidence and let readers decide which one they agree with.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

David should present both the new and old evidence to let readers decide.


Explanation:

David should present the new evidence and old evidence and let readers decide which one they agree with. By doing this, he can acknowledge and address the compelling evidence that made him change his position. It allows for a comprehensive discussion where both sides are considered.


Learn more about Changing opinions based on evidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/10434314


Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.