Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
To verify that two functions [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other, we must check two conditions:
1. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]
This means applying [tex]\( f \)[/tex] to [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g \)[/tex] to [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] should both return the original input [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
Let's evaluate the statements provided:
1. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]: This condition alone is necessary but not sufficient on its own to prove that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses.
2. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = -x \)[/tex]: This is incorrect because both [tex]\( f(g(x)) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) \)[/tex] must return [tex]\( x \)[/tex], not [tex]\(-x \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = \frac{1}{g(f(x))} \)[/tex]: This expression does not prove that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses, as it complicates the relationship unnecessarily and does not adhere to the correct definitions.
4. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]: This condition correctly states that applying one function after the other (in either order) returns the original input [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. This is the precise definition required to verify that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other.
Therefore, the correct statement that verifies [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other is:
[tex]\[ f(g(x)) = x \ \text{and} \ g(f(x)) = x \][/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ f(g(x)) = x \ \text{and} \ g(f(x)) = x \][/tex]
1. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]
This means applying [tex]\( f \)[/tex] to [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g \)[/tex] to [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] should both return the original input [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
Let's evaluate the statements provided:
1. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]: This condition alone is necessary but not sufficient on its own to prove that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses.
2. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = -x \)[/tex]: This is incorrect because both [tex]\( f(g(x)) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) \)[/tex] must return [tex]\( x \)[/tex], not [tex]\(-x \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = \frac{1}{g(f(x))} \)[/tex]: This expression does not prove that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses, as it complicates the relationship unnecessarily and does not adhere to the correct definitions.
4. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]: This condition correctly states that applying one function after the other (in either order) returns the original input [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. This is the precise definition required to verify that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other.
Therefore, the correct statement that verifies [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other is:
[tex]\[ f(g(x)) = x \ \text{and} \ g(f(x)) = x \][/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ f(g(x)) = x \ \text{and} \ g(f(x)) = x \][/tex]
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.