Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Discover in-depth solutions to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine which sets of quantum numbers describe valid orbitals, we need to verify if each set satisfies the rules for quantum numbers:
1. Principal quantum number (n): This must be a positive integer.
2. Angular momentum quantum number (l): This must be an integer within the range [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex].
3. Magnetic quantum number (m): This must be an integer within the range [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex].
Let's evaluate each set based on these rules:
1. [tex]\(n=1, l=0, m=0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 1\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 0 < 1\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-0 \leq 0 \leq 0\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
2. [tex]\(n=2, l=1, m=3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 2\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 1\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 1 < 2\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 3\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-1 \leq 3 \leq 1\)[/tex] does not hold)
- This set is not valid.
3. [tex]\(n=2, l=2, m=2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 2\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 2\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 2 < 2\)[/tex] does not hold)
- [tex]\(m = 2\)[/tex]: is conditional on [tex]\(l\)[/tex] being valid which it is not
- This set is not valid.
4. [tex]\(n=3, l=0, m=0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 3\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 0 < 3\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-0 \leq 0 \leq 0\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
5. [tex]\(n=5, l=4, m=-3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 5\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 4\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 4 < 5\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = -3\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-4 \leq -3 \leq 4\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
6. [tex]\(n=4, l=-2, m=2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 4\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = -2\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(l\)[/tex] must be a non-negative integer within [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(m = 2\)[/tex]: is conditional on [tex]\(l\)[/tex] being valid which it is not
- This set is not valid.
Therefore, the valid sets of quantum numbers are:
[tex]\[ (1, 0, 0), (3, 0, 0), (5, 4, -3) \][/tex]
1. Principal quantum number (n): This must be a positive integer.
2. Angular momentum quantum number (l): This must be an integer within the range [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex].
3. Magnetic quantum number (m): This must be an integer within the range [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex].
Let's evaluate each set based on these rules:
1. [tex]\(n=1, l=0, m=0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 1\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 0 < 1\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-0 \leq 0 \leq 0\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
2. [tex]\(n=2, l=1, m=3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 2\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 1\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 1 < 2\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 3\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-1 \leq 3 \leq 1\)[/tex] does not hold)
- This set is not valid.
3. [tex]\(n=2, l=2, m=2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 2\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 2\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 2 < 2\)[/tex] does not hold)
- [tex]\(m = 2\)[/tex]: is conditional on [tex]\(l\)[/tex] being valid which it is not
- This set is not valid.
4. [tex]\(n=3, l=0, m=0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 3\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 0 < 3\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-0 \leq 0 \leq 0\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
5. [tex]\(n=5, l=4, m=-3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 5\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 4\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 4 < 5\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = -3\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-4 \leq -3 \leq 4\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
6. [tex]\(n=4, l=-2, m=2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 4\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = -2\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(l\)[/tex] must be a non-negative integer within [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(m = 2\)[/tex]: is conditional on [tex]\(l\)[/tex] being valid which it is not
- This set is not valid.
Therefore, the valid sets of quantum numbers are:
[tex]\[ (1, 0, 0), (3, 0, 0), (5, 4, -3) \][/tex]
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.
