Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine how much Annie can spend on lunch for each person while staying within her budget, let's break down the problem with the given information.
1. Annie's total budget is [tex]\(\$ 1325\)[/tex].
2. She plans to rent a meeting room, which costs [tex]\(\$ 270\)[/tex].
3. 26 people (including Annie) are expected to attend the meeting.
4. We need to find the maximum amount [tex]\( x \)[/tex] that Annie can spend on lunch for each person.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Total budget constraint:
The entire expenditure (room cost plus lunch cost) must not exceed the budget.
2. Cost of the meeting room:
The meeting room costs [tex]\(\$ 270\)[/tex], so this amount is reserved from the total budget.
3. Cost of lunch per person:
Let [tex]\( x \)[/tex] be the amount Annie can spend on lunch for each person. Since there are 26 people, the total cost for lunch is [tex]\( 26x \)[/tex].
4. Setting up the inequality:
The sum of the room cost and the total lunch cost should be at most the total budget:
[tex]\[ 270 + 26x \leq 1325 \][/tex]
This inequality reflects that the combined cost should not exceed the total budget.
Now, let's review the options:
A. [tex]\( 26x + 270 \geq 1325 \)[/tex] => This inequality suggests that the combined cost must be greater than or equal to the budget, which is incorrect for our situation.
B. [tex]\( 26x + 270 \leq 1325 \)[/tex] => This inequality correctly represents that the combined cost should not exceed the total budget.
C. [tex]\( 270x + 26 \geq 1325 \)[/tex] => This inequality incorrectly places the room cost as a multiple of [tex]\(x\)[/tex], which is not correct.
D. [tex]\( 270x + 26 \leq 1325 \)[/tex] => This inequality also incorrectly places the room cost as a multiple of [tex]\(x\)[/tex], which is not correct.
From the options given, the correct inequality is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{26x + 270 \leq 1325} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is:
B. [tex]\( 26x + 270 \leq 1325 \)[/tex]
1. Annie's total budget is [tex]\(\$ 1325\)[/tex].
2. She plans to rent a meeting room, which costs [tex]\(\$ 270\)[/tex].
3. 26 people (including Annie) are expected to attend the meeting.
4. We need to find the maximum amount [tex]\( x \)[/tex] that Annie can spend on lunch for each person.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Total budget constraint:
The entire expenditure (room cost plus lunch cost) must not exceed the budget.
2. Cost of the meeting room:
The meeting room costs [tex]\(\$ 270\)[/tex], so this amount is reserved from the total budget.
3. Cost of lunch per person:
Let [tex]\( x \)[/tex] be the amount Annie can spend on lunch for each person. Since there are 26 people, the total cost for lunch is [tex]\( 26x \)[/tex].
4. Setting up the inequality:
The sum of the room cost and the total lunch cost should be at most the total budget:
[tex]\[ 270 + 26x \leq 1325 \][/tex]
This inequality reflects that the combined cost should not exceed the total budget.
Now, let's review the options:
A. [tex]\( 26x + 270 \geq 1325 \)[/tex] => This inequality suggests that the combined cost must be greater than or equal to the budget, which is incorrect for our situation.
B. [tex]\( 26x + 270 \leq 1325 \)[/tex] => This inequality correctly represents that the combined cost should not exceed the total budget.
C. [tex]\( 270x + 26 \geq 1325 \)[/tex] => This inequality incorrectly places the room cost as a multiple of [tex]\(x\)[/tex], which is not correct.
D. [tex]\( 270x + 26 \leq 1325 \)[/tex] => This inequality also incorrectly places the room cost as a multiple of [tex]\(x\)[/tex], which is not correct.
From the options given, the correct inequality is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{26x + 270 \leq 1325} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is:
B. [tex]\( 26x + 270 \leq 1325 \)[/tex]
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.