Answered

Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Sayid recorded the temperatures of four substances in a chart.

Temperatures of Four Substances

\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}
\hline
Substance & Temperature ([tex]${ }^{\circ} C$[/tex]) \\
\hline
W & 12 \\
\hline
[tex]$X$[/tex] & -18 \\
\hline
Y & 9 \\
\hline
[tex]$Z$[/tex] & \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

Which conclusion is best supported by the data?

A. The particles in substance W have a greater average kinetic energy than the particles in substance Z.
B. The particles in substance X have a greater average kinetic energy than the particles in substance Z.
C. The particles in substance W have a lower average kinetic energy than the particles in substance X.
D. The particles in substance Z have a lower average kinetic energy than the particles in substance Y.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer
Based on the given temperatures for substances W, X, and Y, and without a specific temperature provided for substance Z, we can analyze and compare the kinetic energies of the particles in these substances.

Here's a step-by-step explanation of how the correct conclusions are reached:

1. The particles in substance W have a greater average kinetic energy than the particles in substance Z.
- Since there is no specific temperature mentioned for substance Z, it is not possible to conclusively determine if the kinetic energy of particles in W is greater than in Z. The conclusion is indeterminate because of the lack of data for Z; thus, it is noted as having an unknown outcome (-1).

2. The particles in substance X have a greater average kinetic energy than the particles in substance Z.
- Similar to the above comparison, without a specific temperature for Z, it is impossible to conclude if particles in X have greater kinetic energy than those in Z. Thus, this conclusion also remains indeterminate (-1).

3. The particles in substance W have a lower average kinetic energy than the particles in substance X.
- We know the temperature of W is 12°C and the temperature of X is -18°C. Comparing these, since 12°C is higher than -18°C, it indicates that the particles in substance W would have a higher, not lower, kinetic energy compared to substance X. Hence, this conclusion is incorrect (0).

4. The particles in substance Z have a lower average kinetic energy than the particles in substance Y.
- Without a specific temperature value for Z, we can't conclusively determine if the particles in Z have lower kinetic energy compared to Y, which has a temperature of 9°C. Therefore, this conclusion remains indeterminate (-1).

Summarizing the analysis:
- Conclusion 1: Indeterminate due to unknown temperature for Z (-1)
- Conclusion 2: Indeterminate due to unknown temperature for Z (-1)
- Conclusion 3: Incorrect as the particles in W would have higher kinetic energy, not lower (0)
- Conclusion 4: Indeterminate due to unknown temperature for Z (-1)

Thus, the supported answers based on the detailed step-by-step analysis will be:
```
(-1, -1, 0, -1)
```
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.