Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Alexander Hamilton's national bank recommendation represents a loose interpretation of the Constitution, opposed by Madison and Jefferson's strict construction beliefs.
Explanation:
Alexander Hamilton's recommendation for a national bank is an example of a loose interpretation of the Constitution. This is because Hamilton believed that the creation of the Bank of the United States fell under the 'necessary and proper' clause of the Constitution, granting implied powers to the government beyond what was explicitly stated.
Hamilton's proposal was hotly debated, with James Madison and Thomas Jefferson opposing it on the grounds of strict construction, arguing that the national government lacked the authority to establish such an institution. Despite their objections, Hamilton managed to persuade President Washington to sign the bank bill into law, highlighting the ongoing tension between national and state powers during that period.
Learn more about National Bank and Constitutional Interpretation here:
https://brainly.com/question/5055464
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.