At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Our Q&A platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from experts in various disciplines. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Let's analyze each equation given in the options to determine which one does not accurately express the break-even point in sales dollars.
### Option 1: \[tex]$500,000 + 0.60X = X - This equation suggests that the total fixed costs plus 60% of the sales revenue should be equal to the total sales revenue. - Is this equation correct? To find the break-even point, we must consider fixed costs and the contribution margin ratio. The contribution margin ratio is 40%, meaning 60% represents the variable costs. - However, an accurate break-even calculation should account for fixed costs and the portion of sales contributing to fixed costs and profit (contribution margin). - Mathematically: \[ \text{Fixed Costs} + (\text{Variable Cost Ratio} \times X) = \text{Total Sales} \] must be correctly defined by considering the contribution margin (not variable cost ratio). - Therefore, this formulation does not align with proper break-even calculations required. ### Option 2: \$[/tex]500,000 + 0.40X = X
- This equation suggests that total fixed costs plus 40% of sales revenue should equal total sales revenue.
- The 40% is the contribution margin ratio.
- This aligns correctly with break-even point formulation because:
[tex]\[ \text{Fixed Costs} + (\text{Contribution Margin Ratio} \times X) = X \][/tex]
rearranged, this becomes:
[tex]\[ \text{Fixed Costs} = X \times (1 - \text{Contribution Margin Ratio}) \][/tex]
correctly describing the relationship and calculations for break-even point in sales dollars.
### Option 3: \[tex]$500,000 \div \$[/tex]500 = X
- This equation calculates the break-even point in sales units rather than sales dollars, using unit contribution margin.
- To find the break-even point in sales dollars, this result should be multiplied by the unit selling price, but the given formulation calculated as:
[tex]\[ \frac{\text{Fixed Costs}}{\text{Unit Contribution Margin}} = X \][/tex]
- This equation accurately calculates sales units required, not directly sale dollars.
### Option 4: \[tex]$500,000 \div 0.40 = X - This equation calculates the break-even point in sales dollars using contribution margin ratio. - Correctly formulated as: \[ \frac{\text{Fixed Costs}}{\text{Contribution Margin Ratio}} = \text{Sales Dollars at Break-even} \] ### Conclusion: The equation that does not express the break-even point in sales dollars is Option 1: \$[/tex]500,000 + 0.60X = X. This formulation incorrectly represents the break-even point balance in terms of fixed costs and revenue ratios.
### Option 1: \[tex]$500,000 + 0.60X = X - This equation suggests that the total fixed costs plus 60% of the sales revenue should be equal to the total sales revenue. - Is this equation correct? To find the break-even point, we must consider fixed costs and the contribution margin ratio. The contribution margin ratio is 40%, meaning 60% represents the variable costs. - However, an accurate break-even calculation should account for fixed costs and the portion of sales contributing to fixed costs and profit (contribution margin). - Mathematically: \[ \text{Fixed Costs} + (\text{Variable Cost Ratio} \times X) = \text{Total Sales} \] must be correctly defined by considering the contribution margin (not variable cost ratio). - Therefore, this formulation does not align with proper break-even calculations required. ### Option 2: \$[/tex]500,000 + 0.40X = X
- This equation suggests that total fixed costs plus 40% of sales revenue should equal total sales revenue.
- The 40% is the contribution margin ratio.
- This aligns correctly with break-even point formulation because:
[tex]\[ \text{Fixed Costs} + (\text{Contribution Margin Ratio} \times X) = X \][/tex]
rearranged, this becomes:
[tex]\[ \text{Fixed Costs} = X \times (1 - \text{Contribution Margin Ratio}) \][/tex]
correctly describing the relationship and calculations for break-even point in sales dollars.
### Option 3: \[tex]$500,000 \div \$[/tex]500 = X
- This equation calculates the break-even point in sales units rather than sales dollars, using unit contribution margin.
- To find the break-even point in sales dollars, this result should be multiplied by the unit selling price, but the given formulation calculated as:
[tex]\[ \frac{\text{Fixed Costs}}{\text{Unit Contribution Margin}} = X \][/tex]
- This equation accurately calculates sales units required, not directly sale dollars.
### Option 4: \[tex]$500,000 \div 0.40 = X - This equation calculates the break-even point in sales dollars using contribution margin ratio. - Correctly formulated as: \[ \frac{\text{Fixed Costs}}{\text{Contribution Margin Ratio}} = \text{Sales Dollars at Break-even} \] ### Conclusion: The equation that does not express the break-even point in sales dollars is Option 1: \$[/tex]500,000 + 0.60X = X. This formulation incorrectly represents the break-even point balance in terms of fixed costs and revenue ratios.
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.
