Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Gideon v. Wainwright and Miranda v. Arizona are two significant court cases that established the right to counsel for all individuals, including indigent defendants, impacting the criminal court system and ensuring legal representation.
Explanation:
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): This Supreme Court case established the right to access to an attorney regardless of one's ability to pay. It led to significant changes in the criminal court system, ensuring legal representation for all.
Miranda v. Arizona: This case ruled that suspects must be informed of their rights before being questioned by authorities, including the right to remain silent and the right to consult with legal counsel.
Impact on indigent defendants: The Gideon ruling extended the right to counsel to cases involving any potential loss of liberty, resulting in increased demand for public defenders and pro bono legal representation for those unable to afford an attorney.
Learn more about Right to counsel in criminal cases here:
https://brainly.com/question/28000686
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.