Answered

Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Proponents of judicial restraint would tend to have which of the following characteristics?

A. Belief in the Constitution as a flexible document
B. Respect for the roles of the other branches of government
C. Respect for contemporary political views over those of the Framers
D. Willingness to invalidate state law if necessary

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy that emphasizes judges deferring to the decisions of other branches of government and upholding precedent.


Explanation:

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy in which judges are more likely to let stand the decisions or actions of the other branches of government. This approach involves respecting precedent, adhering to the original intent of the Constitution, and deferring to the legislature in matters of public policy.

Advocates of judicial restraint believe that the courts should not be heavily involved in making policy decisions and should leave those to the elected branches of government. They argue that judges, as unelected officials, should avoid political involvement and focus on interpreting laws based on existing legal principles.


Learn more about Judicial restraint here:

https://brainly.com/question/29545866


Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.