Answered

Westonci.ca is your go-to source for answers, with a community ready to provide accurate and timely information. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts ready to help you find solutions. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Proponents of judicial restraint would tend to have which of the following characteristics?

A. Belief in the Constitution as a flexible document
B. Respect for the roles of the other branches of government
C. Respect for contemporary political views over those of the Framers
D. Willingness to invalidate state law if necessary

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy that emphasizes judges deferring to the decisions of other branches of government and upholding precedent.


Explanation:

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy in which judges are more likely to let stand the decisions or actions of the other branches of government. This approach involves respecting precedent, adhering to the original intent of the Constitution, and deferring to the legislature in matters of public policy.

Advocates of judicial restraint believe that the courts should not be heavily involved in making policy decisions and should leave those to the elected branches of government. They argue that judges, as unelected officials, should avoid political involvement and focus on interpreting laws based on existing legal principles.


Learn more about Judicial restraint here:

https://brainly.com/question/29545866


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.