Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Discover comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Let's start by analyzing each option step-by-step to determine which one is not true.
### Option A: [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} = s_{2n} \)[/tex]
Set [tex]\( s_n = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + n\} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( s_{2n} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + 2n\} \)[/tex].
The union [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} \)[/tex] combines all elements from both sets:
- Elements of [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex] are from 100 to [tex]\( 100 + n \)[/tex].
- Elements of [tex]\( s_{2n} \)[/tex] are from 100 to [tex]\( 100 + 2n \)[/tex].
Since [tex]\( 100 + 2n \)[/tex] is always greater than [tex]\( 100 + n \)[/tex], the union of these sets will be exactly [tex]\( s_{2n} \)[/tex], i.e., [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} = s_{2n} \)[/tex].
Thus, Option A is true.
### Option B: If [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex], then [tex]\( s_n \cap s_m = s_n \)[/tex]
Suppose [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex]. Then:
- [tex]\( s_n = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + n \} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_m = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + m \} \)[/tex]
Since [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex], all elements of [tex]\( s_m \)[/tex] are also in [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex]. Therefore, the intersection [tex]\( s_n \cap s_m \)[/tex] contains exactly the elements of [tex]\( s_m \)[/tex] only, not [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex].
Thus, Option B is false.
### Option C: [tex]\( s_{1000} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 1100\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{1000} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + 1000\} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 1100\} \)[/tex]
This statement is directly equal to the definition of [tex]\( s_{1000} \)[/tex].
Thus, Option C is true.
### Option D: [tex]\( s_{60} - s_{30} = \{131, 132, \ldots, 160\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{60} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 160\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{30} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 130\} \)[/tex]
The difference [tex]\( s_{60} - s_{30} \)[/tex] removes elements that are in [tex]\( s_{30} \)[/tex] from [tex]\( s_{60} \)[/tex], leaving:
- Elements in [tex]\( s_{60} \)[/tex] but not in [tex]\( s_{30} \)[/tex] are [tex]\( 131, 132, \ldots, 160 \)[/tex].
Thus, Option D is true.
### Conclusion
By analyzing the provided options, the correct answer (the statement that is not true) is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{B}} \][/tex]
### Option A: [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} = s_{2n} \)[/tex]
Set [tex]\( s_n = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + n\} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( s_{2n} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + 2n\} \)[/tex].
The union [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} \)[/tex] combines all elements from both sets:
- Elements of [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex] are from 100 to [tex]\( 100 + n \)[/tex].
- Elements of [tex]\( s_{2n} \)[/tex] are from 100 to [tex]\( 100 + 2n \)[/tex].
Since [tex]\( 100 + 2n \)[/tex] is always greater than [tex]\( 100 + n \)[/tex], the union of these sets will be exactly [tex]\( s_{2n} \)[/tex], i.e., [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} = s_{2n} \)[/tex].
Thus, Option A is true.
### Option B: If [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex], then [tex]\( s_n \cap s_m = s_n \)[/tex]
Suppose [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex]. Then:
- [tex]\( s_n = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + n \} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_m = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + m \} \)[/tex]
Since [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex], all elements of [tex]\( s_m \)[/tex] are also in [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex]. Therefore, the intersection [tex]\( s_n \cap s_m \)[/tex] contains exactly the elements of [tex]\( s_m \)[/tex] only, not [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex].
Thus, Option B is false.
### Option C: [tex]\( s_{1000} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 1100\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{1000} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + 1000\} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 1100\} \)[/tex]
This statement is directly equal to the definition of [tex]\( s_{1000} \)[/tex].
Thus, Option C is true.
### Option D: [tex]\( s_{60} - s_{30} = \{131, 132, \ldots, 160\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{60} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 160\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{30} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 130\} \)[/tex]
The difference [tex]\( s_{60} - s_{30} \)[/tex] removes elements that are in [tex]\( s_{30} \)[/tex] from [tex]\( s_{60} \)[/tex], leaving:
- Elements in [tex]\( s_{60} \)[/tex] but not in [tex]\( s_{30} \)[/tex] are [tex]\( 131, 132, \ldots, 160 \)[/tex].
Thus, Option D is true.
### Conclusion
By analyzing the provided options, the correct answer (the statement that is not true) is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{B}} \][/tex]
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.