Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Experience the ease of finding quick and accurate answers to your questions from professionals on our platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Let's start by analyzing each option step-by-step to determine which one is not true.
### Option A: [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} = s_{2n} \)[/tex]
Set [tex]\( s_n = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + n\} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( s_{2n} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + 2n\} \)[/tex].
The union [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} \)[/tex] combines all elements from both sets:
- Elements of [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex] are from 100 to [tex]\( 100 + n \)[/tex].
- Elements of [tex]\( s_{2n} \)[/tex] are from 100 to [tex]\( 100 + 2n \)[/tex].
Since [tex]\( 100 + 2n \)[/tex] is always greater than [tex]\( 100 + n \)[/tex], the union of these sets will be exactly [tex]\( s_{2n} \)[/tex], i.e., [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} = s_{2n} \)[/tex].
Thus, Option A is true.
### Option B: If [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex], then [tex]\( s_n \cap s_m = s_n \)[/tex]
Suppose [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex]. Then:
- [tex]\( s_n = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + n \} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_m = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + m \} \)[/tex]
Since [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex], all elements of [tex]\( s_m \)[/tex] are also in [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex]. Therefore, the intersection [tex]\( s_n \cap s_m \)[/tex] contains exactly the elements of [tex]\( s_m \)[/tex] only, not [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex].
Thus, Option B is false.
### Option C: [tex]\( s_{1000} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 1100\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{1000} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + 1000\} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 1100\} \)[/tex]
This statement is directly equal to the definition of [tex]\( s_{1000} \)[/tex].
Thus, Option C is true.
### Option D: [tex]\( s_{60} - s_{30} = \{131, 132, \ldots, 160\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{60} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 160\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{30} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 130\} \)[/tex]
The difference [tex]\( s_{60} - s_{30} \)[/tex] removes elements that are in [tex]\( s_{30} \)[/tex] from [tex]\( s_{60} \)[/tex], leaving:
- Elements in [tex]\( s_{60} \)[/tex] but not in [tex]\( s_{30} \)[/tex] are [tex]\( 131, 132, \ldots, 160 \)[/tex].
Thus, Option D is true.
### Conclusion
By analyzing the provided options, the correct answer (the statement that is not true) is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{B}} \][/tex]
### Option A: [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} = s_{2n} \)[/tex]
Set [tex]\( s_n = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + n\} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( s_{2n} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + 2n\} \)[/tex].
The union [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} \)[/tex] combines all elements from both sets:
- Elements of [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex] are from 100 to [tex]\( 100 + n \)[/tex].
- Elements of [tex]\( s_{2n} \)[/tex] are from 100 to [tex]\( 100 + 2n \)[/tex].
Since [tex]\( 100 + 2n \)[/tex] is always greater than [tex]\( 100 + n \)[/tex], the union of these sets will be exactly [tex]\( s_{2n} \)[/tex], i.e., [tex]\( s_n \cup s_{2n} = s_{2n} \)[/tex].
Thus, Option A is true.
### Option B: If [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex], then [tex]\( s_n \cap s_m = s_n \)[/tex]
Suppose [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex]. Then:
- [tex]\( s_n = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + n \} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_m = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + m \} \)[/tex]
Since [tex]\( n > m \)[/tex], all elements of [tex]\( s_m \)[/tex] are also in [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex]. Therefore, the intersection [tex]\( s_n \cap s_m \)[/tex] contains exactly the elements of [tex]\( s_m \)[/tex] only, not [tex]\( s_n \)[/tex].
Thus, Option B is false.
### Option C: [tex]\( s_{1000} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 1100\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{1000} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 100 + 1000\} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 1100\} \)[/tex]
This statement is directly equal to the definition of [tex]\( s_{1000} \)[/tex].
Thus, Option C is true.
### Option D: [tex]\( s_{60} - s_{30} = \{131, 132, \ldots, 160\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{60} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 160\} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( s_{30} = \{100, 101, \ldots, 130\} \)[/tex]
The difference [tex]\( s_{60} - s_{30} \)[/tex] removes elements that are in [tex]\( s_{30} \)[/tex] from [tex]\( s_{60} \)[/tex], leaving:
- Elements in [tex]\( s_{60} \)[/tex] but not in [tex]\( s_{30} \)[/tex] are [tex]\( 131, 132, \ldots, 160 \)[/tex].
Thus, Option D is true.
### Conclusion
By analyzing the provided options, the correct answer (the statement that is not true) is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{B}} \][/tex]
Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.
