At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
To determine which statement must be true given the conditions [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex], let's analyze each statement step-by-step.
1. Understand the implications:
- [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] means that if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( b \)[/tex] must also be true.
- [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] means that if [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must also be true.
2. Rewriting using logical equivalences:
- [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex].
- [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
3. Combining the statements:
- We have two statements: [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
4. Analyze each option:
- Option A: [tex]\( \neg a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( a \lor c \)[/tex].
- This statement is not necessarily true just because we have [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- Option B: [tex]\( c \Rightarrow a \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg c \lor a \)[/tex].
- This statement is also not necessarily true given our initial implications.
- Option C: [tex]\( \neg a \Rightarrow \neg c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( a \lor \neg c \)[/tex].
- This statement, like the previous ones, is not necessarily true given [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- Option D: [tex]\( a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg a \lor c \)[/tex].
- Now, let's check if this can be derived from the combined statements:
- We have [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex].
- We also have [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex], if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( b \)[/tex] must be true.
- If [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is true, from [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex], [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must be true.
- Therefore, if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must be true, confirming that [tex]\( \neg a \lor c \)[/tex] is indeed true.
Thus, the statement [tex]\( a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] (Option D) is logically consistent with the given premises [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex].
Therefore, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{a \Rightarrow c} \][/tex]
1. Understand the implications:
- [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] means that if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( b \)[/tex] must also be true.
- [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] means that if [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must also be true.
2. Rewriting using logical equivalences:
- [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex].
- [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
3. Combining the statements:
- We have two statements: [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
4. Analyze each option:
- Option A: [tex]\( \neg a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( a \lor c \)[/tex].
- This statement is not necessarily true just because we have [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- Option B: [tex]\( c \Rightarrow a \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg c \lor a \)[/tex].
- This statement is also not necessarily true given our initial implications.
- Option C: [tex]\( \neg a \Rightarrow \neg c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( a \lor \neg c \)[/tex].
- This statement, like the previous ones, is not necessarily true given [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- Option D: [tex]\( a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg a \lor c \)[/tex].
- Now, let's check if this can be derived from the combined statements:
- We have [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex].
- We also have [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex], if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( b \)[/tex] must be true.
- If [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is true, from [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex], [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must be true.
- Therefore, if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must be true, confirming that [tex]\( \neg a \lor c \)[/tex] is indeed true.
Thus, the statement [tex]\( a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] (Option D) is logically consistent with the given premises [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex].
Therefore, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{a \Rightarrow c} \][/tex]
Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.
