Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where experts provide clear and concise information on various topics. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
To determine which statement must be true given the conditions [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex], let's analyze each statement step-by-step.
1. Understand the implications:
- [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] means that if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( b \)[/tex] must also be true.
- [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] means that if [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must also be true.
2. Rewriting using logical equivalences:
- [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex].
- [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
3. Combining the statements:
- We have two statements: [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
4. Analyze each option:
- Option A: [tex]\( \neg a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( a \lor c \)[/tex].
- This statement is not necessarily true just because we have [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- Option B: [tex]\( c \Rightarrow a \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg c \lor a \)[/tex].
- This statement is also not necessarily true given our initial implications.
- Option C: [tex]\( \neg a \Rightarrow \neg c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( a \lor \neg c \)[/tex].
- This statement, like the previous ones, is not necessarily true given [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- Option D: [tex]\( a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg a \lor c \)[/tex].
- Now, let's check if this can be derived from the combined statements:
- We have [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex].
- We also have [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex], if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( b \)[/tex] must be true.
- If [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is true, from [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex], [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must be true.
- Therefore, if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must be true, confirming that [tex]\( \neg a \lor c \)[/tex] is indeed true.
Thus, the statement [tex]\( a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] (Option D) is logically consistent with the given premises [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex].
Therefore, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{a \Rightarrow c} \][/tex]
1. Understand the implications:
- [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] means that if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( b \)[/tex] must also be true.
- [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] means that if [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must also be true.
2. Rewriting using logical equivalences:
- [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex].
- [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
3. Combining the statements:
- We have two statements: [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
4. Analyze each option:
- Option A: [tex]\( \neg a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( a \lor c \)[/tex].
- This statement is not necessarily true just because we have [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- Option B: [tex]\( c \Rightarrow a \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg c \lor a \)[/tex].
- This statement is also not necessarily true given our initial implications.
- Option C: [tex]\( \neg a \Rightarrow \neg c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( a \lor \neg c \)[/tex].
- This statement, like the previous ones, is not necessarily true given [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- Option D: [tex]\( a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex]
- This can be rewritten as [tex]\( \neg a \lor c \)[/tex].
- Now, let's check if this can be derived from the combined statements:
- We have [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex].
- We also have [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex].
- From [tex]\( \neg a \lor b \)[/tex], if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( b \)[/tex] must be true.
- If [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is true, from [tex]\( \neg b \lor c \)[/tex], [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must be true.
- Therefore, if [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true, [tex]\( c \)[/tex] must be true, confirming that [tex]\( \neg a \lor c \)[/tex] is indeed true.
Thus, the statement [tex]\( a \Rightarrow c \)[/tex] (Option D) is logically consistent with the given premises [tex]\( a \Rightarrow b \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \Rightarrow c \)[/tex].
Therefore, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{a \Rightarrow c} \][/tex]
Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.
