As a member of the varsity soccer team, I oppose replacing our grass field with a turf field. This field has been the site of some of the greatest wins in our team’s history. I love the smell of our freshly mown grass when I take the field to play. It reminds me that I am part of a great soccer tradition at this school and inspires me to play my best.

Passage 2:
I support replacing the grass soccer field with a turf field for two reasons. First, the cost of fertilizing, seeding, mowing, and other care for a grass field is expensive. A turf field would cost half as much over five years as a grass field. Second, studies have shown that turf fields last longer and can handle more extreme forms of weather. Their drainage systems prevent field flooding and other issues with grass fields.
Which statement best compares the ways that the two arguments use appeals?