Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Anna Litical runs three trials. She varies the quantity of charge [tex]\(Q\)[/tex] on objects 1 and 2 while keeping the separation distance constant. Her data are shown in the table.

[tex]\[
\begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
\hline
\text{Trial} & Q_1 \, (C) & Q_2 \, (C) \\
\hline
1 & 10 \times 10^{-6} & 400 \times 10^{-6} \\
\hline
2 & 5 \times 10^{-6} & 400 \times 10^{-6} \\
\hline
3 & 10 \times 10^{-6} & 600 \times 10^{-6} \\
\hline
\end{array}
\][/tex]

Which force rankings below are consistent with Anna's data?

A. Strongest force: Trial 1, Weakest force: Trial 2
B. Strongest force: Trial 1, Weakest force: Trial 3
C. Strongest force: Trial 2, Weakest force: Trial 1
D. Strongest force: Trial 2, Weakest force: Trial 3
E. Strongest force: Trial 3, Weakest force: Trial 1
F. Strongest force: Trial 3, Weakest force: Trial 2


Sagot :

To determine the force rankings, we use Coulomb's Law:

[tex]\[ F = k \frac{|Q_1 Q_2|}{r^2} \][/tex]

where [tex]\( F \)[/tex] is the force between two charges, [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is Coulomb's constant, [tex]\( Q_1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( Q_2 \)[/tex] are the charges, and [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is the separation distance between the charges.

Given that the separation distance and Coulomb's constant are the same for all trials, we can compare the forces based on the product of the charges [tex]\( Q_1 Q_2 \)[/tex] only:

For Trial 1:
[tex]\[ Q_1 = 10 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ Q_2 = 400 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F_{\text{Trial 1}} \propto |Q_1 \cdot Q_2| = (10 \times 10^{-6}) \cdot (400 \times 10^{-6}) = 4000 \times 10^{-12} = 4 \times 10^{-9} \][/tex]

For Trial 2:
[tex]\[ Q_1 = 5 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ Q_2 = 400 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F_{\text{Trial 2}} \propto |Q_1 \cdot Q_2| = (5 \times 10^{-6}) \cdot (400 \times 10^{-6}) = 2000 \times 10^{-12} = 2 \times 10^{-9} \][/tex]

For Trial 3:
[tex]\[ Q_1 = 10 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ Q_2 = 600 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F_{\text{Trial 3}} \propto |Q_1 \cdot Q_2| = (10 \times 10^{-6}) \cdot (600 \times 10^{-6}) = 6000 \times 10^{-12} = 6 \times 10^{-9} \][/tex]

Now, let's compare the values:

- [tex]\( F_{\text{Trial 3}} = 6 \times 10^{-9} \)[/tex] (strongest)
- [tex]\( F_{\text{Trial 1}} = 4 \times 10^{-9} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( F_{\text{Trial 2}} = 2 \times 10^{-9} \)[/tex] (weakest)

Thus, according to the force magnitudes:

- The strongest force is in Trial 3
- The intermediate force is in Trial 1
- The weakest force is in Trial 2

Therefore, the correct ranking consistent with Anna's data is:

F. Strongest force: Trial 3, Weakest force: Trial 2