Welcome to Westonci.ca, your ultimate destination for finding answers to a wide range of questions from experts. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Anna Litical runs three trials. She varies the quantity of charge [tex]\(Q\)[/tex] on objects 1 and 2 while keeping the separation distance constant. Her data are shown in the table.

[tex]\[
\begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
\hline
\text{Trial} & Q_1 \, (C) & Q_2 \, (C) \\
\hline
1 & 10 \times 10^{-6} & 400 \times 10^{-6} \\
\hline
2 & 5 \times 10^{-6} & 400 \times 10^{-6} \\
\hline
3 & 10 \times 10^{-6} & 600 \times 10^{-6} \\
\hline
\end{array}
\][/tex]

Which force rankings below are consistent with Anna's data?

A. Strongest force: Trial 1, Weakest force: Trial 2
B. Strongest force: Trial 1, Weakest force: Trial 3
C. Strongest force: Trial 2, Weakest force: Trial 1
D. Strongest force: Trial 2, Weakest force: Trial 3
E. Strongest force: Trial 3, Weakest force: Trial 1
F. Strongest force: Trial 3, Weakest force: Trial 2


Sagot :

To determine the force rankings, we use Coulomb's Law:

[tex]\[ F = k \frac{|Q_1 Q_2|}{r^2} \][/tex]

where [tex]\( F \)[/tex] is the force between two charges, [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is Coulomb's constant, [tex]\( Q_1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( Q_2 \)[/tex] are the charges, and [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is the separation distance between the charges.

Given that the separation distance and Coulomb's constant are the same for all trials, we can compare the forces based on the product of the charges [tex]\( Q_1 Q_2 \)[/tex] only:

For Trial 1:
[tex]\[ Q_1 = 10 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ Q_2 = 400 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F_{\text{Trial 1}} \propto |Q_1 \cdot Q_2| = (10 \times 10^{-6}) \cdot (400 \times 10^{-6}) = 4000 \times 10^{-12} = 4 \times 10^{-9} \][/tex]

For Trial 2:
[tex]\[ Q_1 = 5 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ Q_2 = 400 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F_{\text{Trial 2}} \propto |Q_1 \cdot Q_2| = (5 \times 10^{-6}) \cdot (400 \times 10^{-6}) = 2000 \times 10^{-12} = 2 \times 10^{-9} \][/tex]

For Trial 3:
[tex]\[ Q_1 = 10 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ Q_2 = 600 \times 10^{-6} \, C \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F_{\text{Trial 3}} \propto |Q_1 \cdot Q_2| = (10 \times 10^{-6}) \cdot (600 \times 10^{-6}) = 6000 \times 10^{-12} = 6 \times 10^{-9} \][/tex]

Now, let's compare the values:

- [tex]\( F_{\text{Trial 3}} = 6 \times 10^{-9} \)[/tex] (strongest)
- [tex]\( F_{\text{Trial 1}} = 4 \times 10^{-9} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( F_{\text{Trial 2}} = 2 \times 10^{-9} \)[/tex] (weakest)

Thus, according to the force magnitudes:

- The strongest force is in Trial 3
- The intermediate force is in Trial 1
- The weakest force is in Trial 2

Therefore, the correct ranking consistent with Anna's data is:

F. Strongest force: Trial 3, Weakest force: Trial 2