Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
Let’s determine which of the given prisms is similar to the prism with dimensions [tex]\( \text{length} = 5.2 \)[/tex] units, [tex]\( \text{width} = 2 \)[/tex] units, and [tex]\( \text{height} = 3 \)[/tex] units.
To establish similarity between two right rectangular prisms, their corresponding dimensions should be proportional. We need to find the ratios of dimensions (length to width, width to height, and length to height) and compare these ratios among the prisms.
For the given prism:
- Length-to-width ratio [tex]\( = \frac{5.2}{2} = 2.6 \)[/tex]
- Width-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{2}{3} \approx 0.67 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{5.2}{3} \approx 1.73 \)[/tex]
Prism 1:
- Dimensions: [tex]\( \text{length} = 5.2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{width} = 4 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{height} = 1.5 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-width ratio [tex]\( = \frac{5.2}{4} = 1.3 \)[/tex]
- Width-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{4}{1.5} \approx 2.67 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{5.2}{1.5} \approx 3.47 \)[/tex]
Comparing the ratios with the given prism:
- [tex]\( \frac{5.2}{4} \neq 2.6 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{4}{1.5} \neq 0.67 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{5.2}{1.5} \neq 1.73 \)[/tex]
Thus, Prism 1 is not similar.
Prism 2:
- Dimensions: [tex]\( \text{length} = 2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{width} = 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{height} = 6 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-width ratio [tex]\( = \frac{2}{3} \approx 0.67 \)[/tex]
- Width-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{3}{6} = 0.5 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{2}{6} \approx 0.33 \)[/tex]
Comparing the ratios with the given prism:
- [tex]\( \frac{2}{3} \neq 2.6 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{3}{6} \neq 0.67 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{2}{6} \neq 1.73 \)[/tex]
Thus, Prism 2 is not similar.
Prism 3:
- Dimensions: [tex]\( \text{length} = 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{width} = 10 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{height} = 2.6 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-width ratio [tex]\( = \frac{1}{10} = 0.1 \)[/tex]
- Width-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{10}{2.6} \approx 3.85 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{1}{2.6} \approx 0.38 \)[/tex]
Comparing the ratios with the given prism:
- [tex]\( \frac{1}{10} \neq 2.6 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{10}{2.6} \neq 0.67 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{1}{2.6} \neq 1.73 \)[/tex]
Thus, Prism 3 is not similar.
After evaluating all the given prisms, none of them exhibit the same set of dimension ratios as the original right rectangular prism. Hence, there is no prism similar to the given right rectangular prism.
The conclusion is:
None of the given prisms are similar to the right rectangular prism with dimensions [tex]\( \text{length} = 5.2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{width} = 2 \)[/tex], and [tex]\( \text{height} = 3 \)[/tex] units.
Therefore, the answer is:
-1
To establish similarity between two right rectangular prisms, their corresponding dimensions should be proportional. We need to find the ratios of dimensions (length to width, width to height, and length to height) and compare these ratios among the prisms.
For the given prism:
- Length-to-width ratio [tex]\( = \frac{5.2}{2} = 2.6 \)[/tex]
- Width-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{2}{3} \approx 0.67 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{5.2}{3} \approx 1.73 \)[/tex]
Prism 1:
- Dimensions: [tex]\( \text{length} = 5.2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{width} = 4 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{height} = 1.5 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-width ratio [tex]\( = \frac{5.2}{4} = 1.3 \)[/tex]
- Width-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{4}{1.5} \approx 2.67 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{5.2}{1.5} \approx 3.47 \)[/tex]
Comparing the ratios with the given prism:
- [tex]\( \frac{5.2}{4} \neq 2.6 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{4}{1.5} \neq 0.67 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{5.2}{1.5} \neq 1.73 \)[/tex]
Thus, Prism 1 is not similar.
Prism 2:
- Dimensions: [tex]\( \text{length} = 2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{width} = 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{height} = 6 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-width ratio [tex]\( = \frac{2}{3} \approx 0.67 \)[/tex]
- Width-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{3}{6} = 0.5 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{2}{6} \approx 0.33 \)[/tex]
Comparing the ratios with the given prism:
- [tex]\( \frac{2}{3} \neq 2.6 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{3}{6} \neq 0.67 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{2}{6} \neq 1.73 \)[/tex]
Thus, Prism 2 is not similar.
Prism 3:
- Dimensions: [tex]\( \text{length} = 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{width} = 10 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{height} = 2.6 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-width ratio [tex]\( = \frac{1}{10} = 0.1 \)[/tex]
- Width-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{10}{2.6} \approx 3.85 \)[/tex]
- Length-to-height ratio [tex]\( = \frac{1}{2.6} \approx 0.38 \)[/tex]
Comparing the ratios with the given prism:
- [tex]\( \frac{1}{10} \neq 2.6 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{10}{2.6} \neq 0.67 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \frac{1}{2.6} \neq 1.73 \)[/tex]
Thus, Prism 3 is not similar.
After evaluating all the given prisms, none of them exhibit the same set of dimension ratios as the original right rectangular prism. Hence, there is no prism similar to the given right rectangular prism.
The conclusion is:
None of the given prisms are similar to the right rectangular prism with dimensions [tex]\( \text{length} = 5.2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( \text{width} = 2 \)[/tex], and [tex]\( \text{height} = 3 \)[/tex] units.
Therefore, the answer is:
-1
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.
