Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Explore our Q&A platform to find in-depth answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To tackle this problem, we'll analyze the given logical statements and their converses.
### Original Statement:
The original statement provided is:
"A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal."
Using the given notation:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: A number is a rational number.
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: A number can be represented as a terminating decimal.
This original statement can be written as:
[tex]\[ p \leftrightarrow q \][/tex]
which means: "A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal."
### Converse of the Statement:
The converse of the statement is obtained by swapping [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ q \leftrightarrow p \][/tex]
In plain language, the converse statement is:
"A number can be represented as a terminating decimal if and only if it is a rational number."
Now, let's examine the truth of the converse:
- The original statement itself is somewhat misleading because not all rational numbers can be represented as terminating decimals. Rational numbers can also be represented as repeating (non-terminating) decimals (for example, [tex]\( \frac{1}{3} = 0.333... \)[/tex]).
However, every terminating decimal can be expressed as a rational number because it can be written as a fraction of two integers.
This means:
- The converse statement "[tex]$q \leftrightarrow p$[/tex]" is true interpretatively because every terminating decimal is, in fact, a rational number.
### Analysis of Given Options:
- [tex]\(\sim q \leftrightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]: This represents the contrapositive form, which is logically equivalent to the original statement but not the converse.
- The converse of the statement is false: This is incorrect because the converse can be true as discussed.
- [tex]\(\sim p \leftrightarrow \sim q\)[/tex]: This is also the contrapositive and not the converse.
- The converse of the statement is sometimes true and sometimes false: Misleading, because as interpreted correctly, the converse is true.
- The converse of the statement is true: This is contextually accurate.
- [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]: This correctly represents the converse statement.
- [tex]\(p \leftrightarrow q\)[/tex]: This is the original statement, not the converse.
### Conclusion:
From the options, the correct answers are:
- The converse of the statement is true.
- [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]
Thus, the correct selections are:
1. The converse of the statement is true.
2. [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]
### Original Statement:
The original statement provided is:
"A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal."
Using the given notation:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: A number is a rational number.
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: A number can be represented as a terminating decimal.
This original statement can be written as:
[tex]\[ p \leftrightarrow q \][/tex]
which means: "A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal."
### Converse of the Statement:
The converse of the statement is obtained by swapping [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ q \leftrightarrow p \][/tex]
In plain language, the converse statement is:
"A number can be represented as a terminating decimal if and only if it is a rational number."
Now, let's examine the truth of the converse:
- The original statement itself is somewhat misleading because not all rational numbers can be represented as terminating decimals. Rational numbers can also be represented as repeating (non-terminating) decimals (for example, [tex]\( \frac{1}{3} = 0.333... \)[/tex]).
However, every terminating decimal can be expressed as a rational number because it can be written as a fraction of two integers.
This means:
- The converse statement "[tex]$q \leftrightarrow p$[/tex]" is true interpretatively because every terminating decimal is, in fact, a rational number.
### Analysis of Given Options:
- [tex]\(\sim q \leftrightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]: This represents the contrapositive form, which is logically equivalent to the original statement but not the converse.
- The converse of the statement is false: This is incorrect because the converse can be true as discussed.
- [tex]\(\sim p \leftrightarrow \sim q\)[/tex]: This is also the contrapositive and not the converse.
- The converse of the statement is sometimes true and sometimes false: Misleading, because as interpreted correctly, the converse is true.
- The converse of the statement is true: This is contextually accurate.
- [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]: This correctly represents the converse statement.
- [tex]\(p \leftrightarrow q\)[/tex]: This is the original statement, not the converse.
### Conclusion:
From the options, the correct answers are:
- The converse of the statement is true.
- [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]
Thus, the correct selections are:
1. The converse of the statement is true.
2. [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.
