Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of seasoned experts on our user-friendly platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To tackle this problem, we'll analyze the given logical statements and their converses.
### Original Statement:
The original statement provided is:
"A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal."
Using the given notation:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: A number is a rational number.
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: A number can be represented as a terminating decimal.
This original statement can be written as:
[tex]\[ p \leftrightarrow q \][/tex]
which means: "A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal."
### Converse of the Statement:
The converse of the statement is obtained by swapping [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ q \leftrightarrow p \][/tex]
In plain language, the converse statement is:
"A number can be represented as a terminating decimal if and only if it is a rational number."
Now, let's examine the truth of the converse:
- The original statement itself is somewhat misleading because not all rational numbers can be represented as terminating decimals. Rational numbers can also be represented as repeating (non-terminating) decimals (for example, [tex]\( \frac{1}{3} = 0.333... \)[/tex]).
However, every terminating decimal can be expressed as a rational number because it can be written as a fraction of two integers.
This means:
- The converse statement "[tex]$q \leftrightarrow p$[/tex]" is true interpretatively because every terminating decimal is, in fact, a rational number.
### Analysis of Given Options:
- [tex]\(\sim q \leftrightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]: This represents the contrapositive form, which is logically equivalent to the original statement but not the converse.
- The converse of the statement is false: This is incorrect because the converse can be true as discussed.
- [tex]\(\sim p \leftrightarrow \sim q\)[/tex]: This is also the contrapositive and not the converse.
- The converse of the statement is sometimes true and sometimes false: Misleading, because as interpreted correctly, the converse is true.
- The converse of the statement is true: This is contextually accurate.
- [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]: This correctly represents the converse statement.
- [tex]\(p \leftrightarrow q\)[/tex]: This is the original statement, not the converse.
### Conclusion:
From the options, the correct answers are:
- The converse of the statement is true.
- [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]
Thus, the correct selections are:
1. The converse of the statement is true.
2. [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]
### Original Statement:
The original statement provided is:
"A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal."
Using the given notation:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: A number is a rational number.
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: A number can be represented as a terminating decimal.
This original statement can be written as:
[tex]\[ p \leftrightarrow q \][/tex]
which means: "A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal."
### Converse of the Statement:
The converse of the statement is obtained by swapping [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ q \leftrightarrow p \][/tex]
In plain language, the converse statement is:
"A number can be represented as a terminating decimal if and only if it is a rational number."
Now, let's examine the truth of the converse:
- The original statement itself is somewhat misleading because not all rational numbers can be represented as terminating decimals. Rational numbers can also be represented as repeating (non-terminating) decimals (for example, [tex]\( \frac{1}{3} = 0.333... \)[/tex]).
However, every terminating decimal can be expressed as a rational number because it can be written as a fraction of two integers.
This means:
- The converse statement "[tex]$q \leftrightarrow p$[/tex]" is true interpretatively because every terminating decimal is, in fact, a rational number.
### Analysis of Given Options:
- [tex]\(\sim q \leftrightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]: This represents the contrapositive form, which is logically equivalent to the original statement but not the converse.
- The converse of the statement is false: This is incorrect because the converse can be true as discussed.
- [tex]\(\sim p \leftrightarrow \sim q\)[/tex]: This is also the contrapositive and not the converse.
- The converse of the statement is sometimes true and sometimes false: Misleading, because as interpreted correctly, the converse is true.
- The converse of the statement is true: This is contextually accurate.
- [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]: This correctly represents the converse statement.
- [tex]\(p \leftrightarrow q\)[/tex]: This is the original statement, not the converse.
### Conclusion:
From the options, the correct answers are:
- The converse of the statement is true.
- [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]
Thus, the correct selections are:
1. The converse of the statement is true.
2. [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.
