Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your ultimate destination for finding answers to a wide range of questions from experts. Experience the ease of finding accurate answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Select all the correct answers.

A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal.

Let:
p: A number is a rational number.
q: A number can be represented as a terminating decimal.

Which represents the converse of this statement? Is the converse true?

A. [tex]$\sim q \leftrightarrow \sim p$[/tex]
B. The converse of the statement is false.
C. [tex]$\sim p \leftrightarrow \sim q$[/tex]
D. The converse of the statement is sometimes true and sometimes false.
E. The converse of the statement is true.
F. [tex]$q \leftrightarrow p$[/tex]
G. [tex]$p \leftrightarrow q$[/tex]

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer
To tackle this problem, we'll analyze the given logical statements and their converses.

### Original Statement:
The original statement provided is:
"A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal."

Using the given notation:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: A number is a rational number.
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: A number can be represented as a terminating decimal.

This original statement can be written as:
[tex]\[ p \leftrightarrow q \][/tex]
which means: "A number is a rational number if and only if it can be represented as a terminating decimal."

### Converse of the Statement:
The converse of the statement is obtained by swapping [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ q \leftrightarrow p \][/tex]

In plain language, the converse statement is:
"A number can be represented as a terminating decimal if and only if it is a rational number."

Now, let's examine the truth of the converse:
- The original statement itself is somewhat misleading because not all rational numbers can be represented as terminating decimals. Rational numbers can also be represented as repeating (non-terminating) decimals (for example, [tex]\( \frac{1}{3} = 0.333... \)[/tex]).

However, every terminating decimal can be expressed as a rational number because it can be written as a fraction of two integers.

This means:
- The converse statement "[tex]$q \leftrightarrow p$[/tex]" is true interpretatively because every terminating decimal is, in fact, a rational number.

### Analysis of Given Options:
- [tex]\(\sim q \leftrightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]: This represents the contrapositive form, which is logically equivalent to the original statement but not the converse.
- The converse of the statement is false: This is incorrect because the converse can be true as discussed.
- [tex]\(\sim p \leftrightarrow \sim q\)[/tex]: This is also the contrapositive and not the converse.
- The converse of the statement is sometimes true and sometimes false: Misleading, because as interpreted correctly, the converse is true.
- The converse of the statement is true: This is contextually accurate.
- [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]: This correctly represents the converse statement.
- [tex]\(p \leftrightarrow q\)[/tex]: This is the original statement, not the converse.

### Conclusion:
From the options, the correct answers are:
- The converse of the statement is true.
- [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]

Thus, the correct selections are:
1. The converse of the statement is true.
2. [tex]\(q \leftrightarrow p\)[/tex]
Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.