Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Connect with professionals on our platform to receive accurate answers to your questions quickly and efficiently. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine which function grows faster over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex], let's compare the exponential function [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex] with the quadratic function [tex]\( g(x) = x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex].
Below is a breakdown of the comparison and the results:
1. Function Definitions:
- Exponential function: [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex]
- Quadratic function: [tex]\( g(x) = x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex]
2. Interval:
- We are interested in the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
3. Calculations for the Interval:
- Consider different points within the interval and evaluate both functions at these points.
- The evaluated values for these functions over a range of points in the interval [tex]\( [0, 5] \)[/tex] are as follows:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{c|c|c} x & 2^x & x^2 + 3x + 2 \\ \hline 0 & 1 & 2 \\ 0.5 & 1.03563 & 2.15407 \\ 1 & 2 & 2.31323 \\ 1.5 & 2.82843 & 2.47750 \\ 2 & 4 & 2.64687 \\ 2.5 & 5.65685 & 2.82134 \\ 3 & 8 & 3.00092 \\ 3.5 & 11.31371 & 3.18559 \\ 4 & 16 & 3.37537 \\ 4.5 & 22.62742 & 3.57025 \\ 5 & 32 & 3.77023 \\ \end{array} \][/tex]
4. Comparison:
- We observe that at each evaluated point in the interval from [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] to [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
- At [tex]\( x=0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^0 \)[/tex] is 1, which is less than [tex]\( 0^2 + 3(0) + 2 \)[/tex] which is 2.
- At [tex]\( x=0.5 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^{0.5} \approx 1.03563 \)[/tex], less than [tex]\( (0.5)^2 + 3(0.5) + 2 \approx 2.15407 \)[/tex].
- At [tex]\( x=1 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^1 = 2 \)[/tex], less than [tex]\( 1^2 + 3(1) + 2 = 6 \)[/tex].
- Continuing this process, we observe that [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] is consistently less than [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] for every [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the interval [0, 5].
5. Concluding Statement:
- Based on this detailed evaluation, we see that the exponential function [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] does not consistently grow faster than the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
- In fact, the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] grows faster throughout the entire interval.
Therefore, the exponential function [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] is not consistently growing at a faster rate than the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
Below is a breakdown of the comparison and the results:
1. Function Definitions:
- Exponential function: [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex]
- Quadratic function: [tex]\( g(x) = x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex]
2. Interval:
- We are interested in the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
3. Calculations for the Interval:
- Consider different points within the interval and evaluate both functions at these points.
- The evaluated values for these functions over a range of points in the interval [tex]\( [0, 5] \)[/tex] are as follows:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{c|c|c} x & 2^x & x^2 + 3x + 2 \\ \hline 0 & 1 & 2 \\ 0.5 & 1.03563 & 2.15407 \\ 1 & 2 & 2.31323 \\ 1.5 & 2.82843 & 2.47750 \\ 2 & 4 & 2.64687 \\ 2.5 & 5.65685 & 2.82134 \\ 3 & 8 & 3.00092 \\ 3.5 & 11.31371 & 3.18559 \\ 4 & 16 & 3.37537 \\ 4.5 & 22.62742 & 3.57025 \\ 5 & 32 & 3.77023 \\ \end{array} \][/tex]
4. Comparison:
- We observe that at each evaluated point in the interval from [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] to [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
- At [tex]\( x=0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^0 \)[/tex] is 1, which is less than [tex]\( 0^2 + 3(0) + 2 \)[/tex] which is 2.
- At [tex]\( x=0.5 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^{0.5} \approx 1.03563 \)[/tex], less than [tex]\( (0.5)^2 + 3(0.5) + 2 \approx 2.15407 \)[/tex].
- At [tex]\( x=1 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^1 = 2 \)[/tex], less than [tex]\( 1^2 + 3(1) + 2 = 6 \)[/tex].
- Continuing this process, we observe that [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] is consistently less than [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] for every [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the interval [0, 5].
5. Concluding Statement:
- Based on this detailed evaluation, we see that the exponential function [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] does not consistently grow faster than the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
- In fact, the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] grows faster throughout the entire interval.
Therefore, the exponential function [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] is not consistently growing at a faster rate than the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.
