Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
To determine which function grows faster over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex], let's compare the exponential function [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex] with the quadratic function [tex]\( g(x) = x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex].
Below is a breakdown of the comparison and the results:
1. Function Definitions:
- Exponential function: [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex]
- Quadratic function: [tex]\( g(x) = x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex]
2. Interval:
- We are interested in the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
3. Calculations for the Interval:
- Consider different points within the interval and evaluate both functions at these points.
- The evaluated values for these functions over a range of points in the interval [tex]\( [0, 5] \)[/tex] are as follows:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{c|c|c} x & 2^x & x^2 + 3x + 2 \\ \hline 0 & 1 & 2 \\ 0.5 & 1.03563 & 2.15407 \\ 1 & 2 & 2.31323 \\ 1.5 & 2.82843 & 2.47750 \\ 2 & 4 & 2.64687 \\ 2.5 & 5.65685 & 2.82134 \\ 3 & 8 & 3.00092 \\ 3.5 & 11.31371 & 3.18559 \\ 4 & 16 & 3.37537 \\ 4.5 & 22.62742 & 3.57025 \\ 5 & 32 & 3.77023 \\ \end{array} \][/tex]
4. Comparison:
- We observe that at each evaluated point in the interval from [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] to [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
- At [tex]\( x=0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^0 \)[/tex] is 1, which is less than [tex]\( 0^2 + 3(0) + 2 \)[/tex] which is 2.
- At [tex]\( x=0.5 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^{0.5} \approx 1.03563 \)[/tex], less than [tex]\( (0.5)^2 + 3(0.5) + 2 \approx 2.15407 \)[/tex].
- At [tex]\( x=1 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^1 = 2 \)[/tex], less than [tex]\( 1^2 + 3(1) + 2 = 6 \)[/tex].
- Continuing this process, we observe that [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] is consistently less than [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] for every [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the interval [0, 5].
5. Concluding Statement:
- Based on this detailed evaluation, we see that the exponential function [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] does not consistently grow faster than the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
- In fact, the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] grows faster throughout the entire interval.
Therefore, the exponential function [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] is not consistently growing at a faster rate than the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
Below is a breakdown of the comparison and the results:
1. Function Definitions:
- Exponential function: [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex]
- Quadratic function: [tex]\( g(x) = x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex]
2. Interval:
- We are interested in the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
3. Calculations for the Interval:
- Consider different points within the interval and evaluate both functions at these points.
- The evaluated values for these functions over a range of points in the interval [tex]\( [0, 5] \)[/tex] are as follows:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{c|c|c} x & 2^x & x^2 + 3x + 2 \\ \hline 0 & 1 & 2 \\ 0.5 & 1.03563 & 2.15407 \\ 1 & 2 & 2.31323 \\ 1.5 & 2.82843 & 2.47750 \\ 2 & 4 & 2.64687 \\ 2.5 & 5.65685 & 2.82134 \\ 3 & 8 & 3.00092 \\ 3.5 & 11.31371 & 3.18559 \\ 4 & 16 & 3.37537 \\ 4.5 & 22.62742 & 3.57025 \\ 5 & 32 & 3.77023 \\ \end{array} \][/tex]
4. Comparison:
- We observe that at each evaluated point in the interval from [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] to [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
- At [tex]\( x=0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^0 \)[/tex] is 1, which is less than [tex]\( 0^2 + 3(0) + 2 \)[/tex] which is 2.
- At [tex]\( x=0.5 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^{0.5} \approx 1.03563 \)[/tex], less than [tex]\( (0.5)^2 + 3(0.5) + 2 \approx 2.15407 \)[/tex].
- At [tex]\( x=1 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 2^1 = 2 \)[/tex], less than [tex]\( 1^2 + 3(1) + 2 = 6 \)[/tex].
- Continuing this process, we observe that [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] is consistently less than [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] for every [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the interval [0, 5].
5. Concluding Statement:
- Based on this detailed evaluation, we see that the exponential function [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] does not consistently grow faster than the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
- In fact, the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] grows faster throughout the entire interval.
Therefore, the exponential function [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] is not consistently growing at a faster rate than the quadratic function [tex]\( x^2 + 3x + 2 \)[/tex] over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.