Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To analyze the end behavior of the logarithmic function [tex]\( f(x) = \log(x + 3) - 2 \)[/tex], let's carefully understand its characteristics and behavior at extreme values of [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
1. Vertical Asymptote: The logarithmic function [tex]\( \log(x + 3) \)[/tex] has a vertical asymptote where its argument equals zero. Therefore, we set:
[tex]\[ x + 3 = 0 \implies x = -3 \][/tex]
This means there is a vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
2. End Behavior as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] Decreases:
- When [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex] from the right (i.e., as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] gets closer to -3 but remains greater than -3), the term [tex]\( x + 3 \)[/tex] approaches 0 from the positive side.
- The logarithmic function [tex]\( \log(x + 3) \)[/tex] tends towards negative infinity as [tex]\( x + 3 \)[/tex] approaches 0 from the positive side.
- Consequently, [tex]\( \log(x + 3) - 2 \)[/tex] will also approach negative infinity.
Therefore, as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases and approaches -3 from the right, the value of [tex]\( y \)[/tex] (or [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]) approaches negative infinity.
Given the above analysis, let’s compare this with the provided choices:
A. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
- This statement correctly describes the behavior near the vertical asymptote.
B. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex].
- This is incorrect because the vertical asymptote is at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex], not [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex].
C. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches negative infinity.
- This is incorrect since as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, [tex]\( \log(x + 3) - 2 \)[/tex] actually increases (because logarithmic functions increase as their argument increases).
D. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches positive infinity.
- This is incorrect because as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases towards the vertical asymptote [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y \)[/tex] tends towards negative infinity, not positive infinity.
Thus, the correct answer is:
A. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
1. Vertical Asymptote: The logarithmic function [tex]\( \log(x + 3) \)[/tex] has a vertical asymptote where its argument equals zero. Therefore, we set:
[tex]\[ x + 3 = 0 \implies x = -3 \][/tex]
This means there is a vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
2. End Behavior as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] Decreases:
- When [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex] from the right (i.e., as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] gets closer to -3 but remains greater than -3), the term [tex]\( x + 3 \)[/tex] approaches 0 from the positive side.
- The logarithmic function [tex]\( \log(x + 3) \)[/tex] tends towards negative infinity as [tex]\( x + 3 \)[/tex] approaches 0 from the positive side.
- Consequently, [tex]\( \log(x + 3) - 2 \)[/tex] will also approach negative infinity.
Therefore, as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases and approaches -3 from the right, the value of [tex]\( y \)[/tex] (or [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]) approaches negative infinity.
Given the above analysis, let’s compare this with the provided choices:
A. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
- This statement correctly describes the behavior near the vertical asymptote.
B. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex].
- This is incorrect because the vertical asymptote is at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex], not [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex].
C. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches negative infinity.
- This is incorrect since as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, [tex]\( \log(x + 3) - 2 \)[/tex] actually increases (because logarithmic functions increase as their argument increases).
D. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches positive infinity.
- This is incorrect because as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases towards the vertical asymptote [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y \)[/tex] tends towards negative infinity, not positive infinity.
Thus, the correct answer is:
A. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.
