Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
To analyze the end behavior of the logarithmic function [tex]\( f(x) = \log(x + 3) - 2 \)[/tex], let's carefully understand its characteristics and behavior at extreme values of [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
1. Vertical Asymptote: The logarithmic function [tex]\( \log(x + 3) \)[/tex] has a vertical asymptote where its argument equals zero. Therefore, we set:
[tex]\[ x + 3 = 0 \implies x = -3 \][/tex]
This means there is a vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
2. End Behavior as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] Decreases:
- When [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex] from the right (i.e., as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] gets closer to -3 but remains greater than -3), the term [tex]\( x + 3 \)[/tex] approaches 0 from the positive side.
- The logarithmic function [tex]\( \log(x + 3) \)[/tex] tends towards negative infinity as [tex]\( x + 3 \)[/tex] approaches 0 from the positive side.
- Consequently, [tex]\( \log(x + 3) - 2 \)[/tex] will also approach negative infinity.
Therefore, as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases and approaches -3 from the right, the value of [tex]\( y \)[/tex] (or [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]) approaches negative infinity.
Given the above analysis, let’s compare this with the provided choices:
A. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
- This statement correctly describes the behavior near the vertical asymptote.
B. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex].
- This is incorrect because the vertical asymptote is at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex], not [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex].
C. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches negative infinity.
- This is incorrect since as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, [tex]\( \log(x + 3) - 2 \)[/tex] actually increases (because logarithmic functions increase as their argument increases).
D. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches positive infinity.
- This is incorrect because as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases towards the vertical asymptote [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y \)[/tex] tends towards negative infinity, not positive infinity.
Thus, the correct answer is:
A. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
1. Vertical Asymptote: The logarithmic function [tex]\( \log(x + 3) \)[/tex] has a vertical asymptote where its argument equals zero. Therefore, we set:
[tex]\[ x + 3 = 0 \implies x = -3 \][/tex]
This means there is a vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
2. End Behavior as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] Decreases:
- When [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex] from the right (i.e., as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] gets closer to -3 but remains greater than -3), the term [tex]\( x + 3 \)[/tex] approaches 0 from the positive side.
- The logarithmic function [tex]\( \log(x + 3) \)[/tex] tends towards negative infinity as [tex]\( x + 3 \)[/tex] approaches 0 from the positive side.
- Consequently, [tex]\( \log(x + 3) - 2 \)[/tex] will also approach negative infinity.
Therefore, as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases and approaches -3 from the right, the value of [tex]\( y \)[/tex] (or [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]) approaches negative infinity.
Given the above analysis, let’s compare this with the provided choices:
A. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
- This statement correctly describes the behavior near the vertical asymptote.
B. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex].
- This is incorrect because the vertical asymptote is at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex], not [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex].
C. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches negative infinity.
- This is incorrect since as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, [tex]\( \log(x + 3) - 2 \)[/tex] actually increases (because logarithmic functions increase as their argument increases).
D. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches positive infinity.
- This is incorrect because as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases towards the vertical asymptote [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y \)[/tex] tends towards negative infinity, not positive infinity.
Thus, the correct answer is:
A. As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases, [tex]\( y \)[/tex] approaches the vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = -3 \)[/tex].
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.
