Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Connect with professionals on our platform to receive accurate answers to your questions quickly and efficiently. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The courts have ruled that the statement is false as journalists can be required to reveal their sources if needed for a criminal trial.
Explanation:
False
The statement that the government's use of informants and confidential sources is unlawful and ineffective in the investigative process is false. The courts have ruled that journalists are not exempt from revealing confidential sources. For example, in the case of Branzburg v. Hayes (1972), the Supreme Court determined that journalists could be forced to disclose their sources if necessary for a criminal trial, showing that the government can pursue the names of these sources.
Learn more about confidential sources, Branzburg v. Hayes case, government investigation here:
https://brainly.com/question/32008358
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.