Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of seasoned experts on our user-friendly platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The courts have ruled that the statement is false as journalists can be required to reveal their sources if needed for a criminal trial.
Explanation:
False
The statement that the government's use of informants and confidential sources is unlawful and ineffective in the investigative process is false. The courts have ruled that journalists are not exempt from revealing confidential sources. For example, in the case of Branzburg v. Hayes (1972), the Supreme Court determined that journalists could be forced to disclose their sources if necessary for a criminal trial, showing that the government can pursue the names of these sources.
Learn more about confidential sources, Branzburg v. Hayes case, government investigation here:
https://brainly.com/question/32008358
Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.