Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Read the following claim and counterclaim from an essay:

Claim: Hybrid cars are better for the environment than conventional cars.

Counterclaim: Hybrid batteries will pollute the landfills when they can no longer deliver power to the cars.

Which of the following is the most relevant rebuttal to the counterclaim?

A. Using less gasoline per mile compensates for the dead batteries in the landfills, so hybrids are still better than gasoline-powered vehicles.
B. It doesn't really matter how many batteries are in the landfills as long as the carbon dioxide emissions are kept down.
C. Manufacturers are developing recycling plans to reduce the number of hybrid batteries that make it to landfills.
D. Even though the hybrid batteries don't last forever, they are expected to last for at least 100,000 miles of driving.


Sagot :

Final answer:

The most relevant rebuttal to the counterclaim is Option C, as manufacturers are developing recycling plans to reduce the number of hybrid batteries in landfills.


Explanation:

The most relevant rebuttal to the counterclaim that hybrid batteries will pollute landfills due to their disposal is Option C. This is because manufacturers are developing recycling plans to reduce the number of hybrid batteries that end up in landfills, mitigating the environmental impact of disposed batteries.


Learn more about Hybrid cars and environmental impact here:

https://brainly.com/question/39588866