Answered

Looking for trustworthy answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney.

"The question before us is whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the Government might choose to grant them."

What is Taney's claim in this passage?

A. that Black people were covered by the Constitution's definition of citizen
B. that emancipated Black people had rights guaranteed by the government
C. that Black people were not part of the group considered citizens by the Constitution
D. that Black people would have to get the government's permission to be citizens

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Chief Justice Taney claimed that Black people were not considered part of the citizen group defined by the Constitution.


Explanation:

Chief Justice Taney's claim in the passage is that Black people were not considered part of the group of citizens defined by the Constitution. Taney argued that enslaved individuals, whether emancipated or not, were viewed as a subordinate class with no rights or privileges under the Constitution. This perspective was reflected in the Dred Scott v. Sandford ruling, where it was stated that Blacks could not be U.S. citizens.


Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford

Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.