Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a knowledgeable network of professionals. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
To determine which table of values matches the equation [tex]\( c = 3.5b \)[/tex] and includes only viable solutions, let's first understand what viable solutions mean in this context. Here, viable solutions should include the number of loaves of bread purchased and the corresponding cost in dollars, based on the equation provided.
### Given Tables
1. First Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline Loaves (b) & Cost (c) \\ \hline -2 & -7 \\ \hline 0 & 0 \\ \hline 2 & 7 \\ \hline 4 & 14 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
2. Second Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline Loaves (b) & Cost (c) \\ \hline 0 & 0 \\ \hline 0.5 & 1.75 \\ \hline 1 & 3.5 \\ \hline 1.5 & 5.25 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
3. Third Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline Loaves (b) & Cost (c) \\ \hline 0 & 0 \\ \hline 3 & 10.5 \\ \hline 6 & 21 \\ \hline 9 & 31.5 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
### Calculation Check
Let's verify which table matches the given equation [tex]\( c = 3.5b \)[/tex] using viable values.
1. First Table:
- [tex]\( b = -2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times (-2) = -7 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 0 = 0 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 2 = 7 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 4 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 4 = 14 \)[/tex]
These match the costs calculated, but [tex]\( b = -2 \)[/tex] is not a viable solution for the number of loaves of bread (as you cannot purchase negative loaves).
2. Second Table:
- [tex]\( b = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 0 = 0 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 0.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 0.5 = 1.75 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 1 = 3.5 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 1.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 1.5 = 5.25 \)[/tex]
These values all match the costs calculated and include only non-negative values for [tex]\( b \)[/tex].
3. Third Table:
- [tex]\( b = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 0 = 0 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 3 = 10.5 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 6 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 6 = 21 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 9 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 9 = 31.5 \)[/tex]
These values also match the costs calculated and include only non-negative values for [tex]\( b \)[/tex].
### Conclusion
While all three tables can match the cost values generated by the equation [tex]\( c = 3.5b \)[/tex], the criterion of viable solutions — typically non-negative number of loaves [tex]\( b \)[/tex] — disqualifies the first table due to the negative value.
Therefore, both the second and third tables include only viable solutions.
However, as they ask for the 'only viable solutions', it is implied that the values of loaves should not be negative. So either of the second and third tables should be correct, with second table being the primary choice for lower range of values.
### Given Tables
1. First Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline Loaves (b) & Cost (c) \\ \hline -2 & -7 \\ \hline 0 & 0 \\ \hline 2 & 7 \\ \hline 4 & 14 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
2. Second Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline Loaves (b) & Cost (c) \\ \hline 0 & 0 \\ \hline 0.5 & 1.75 \\ \hline 1 & 3.5 \\ \hline 1.5 & 5.25 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
3. Third Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline Loaves (b) & Cost (c) \\ \hline 0 & 0 \\ \hline 3 & 10.5 \\ \hline 6 & 21 \\ \hline 9 & 31.5 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
### Calculation Check
Let's verify which table matches the given equation [tex]\( c = 3.5b \)[/tex] using viable values.
1. First Table:
- [tex]\( b = -2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times (-2) = -7 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 0 = 0 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 2 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 2 = 7 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 4 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 4 = 14 \)[/tex]
These match the costs calculated, but [tex]\( b = -2 \)[/tex] is not a viable solution for the number of loaves of bread (as you cannot purchase negative loaves).
2. Second Table:
- [tex]\( b = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 0 = 0 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 0.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 0.5 = 1.75 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 1 = 3.5 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 1.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 1.5 = 5.25 \)[/tex]
These values all match the costs calculated and include only non-negative values for [tex]\( b \)[/tex].
3. Third Table:
- [tex]\( b = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 0 = 0 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 3 = 10.5 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 6 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 6 = 21 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( b = 9 \)[/tex], [tex]\( c = 3.5 \times 9 = 31.5 \)[/tex]
These values also match the costs calculated and include only non-negative values for [tex]\( b \)[/tex].
### Conclusion
While all three tables can match the cost values generated by the equation [tex]\( c = 3.5b \)[/tex], the criterion of viable solutions — typically non-negative number of loaves [tex]\( b \)[/tex] — disqualifies the first table due to the negative value.
Therefore, both the second and third tables include only viable solutions.
However, as they ask for the 'only viable solutions', it is implied that the values of loaves should not be negative. So either of the second and third tables should be correct, with second table being the primary choice for lower range of values.
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.
