Answered

Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Explore our Q&A platform to find reliable answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Which statement best evaluates the effectiveness of the evidence used to support the claim that cruelty is a necessary part of leadership?

A. The evidence effectively demonstrates that cruelty is sometimes necessary to maintain order and authority.
B. The evidence is insufficient and does not convincingly show that cruelty is necessary for leadership.
C. The evidence is well-chosen and illustrates historical examples where cruelty led to successful leadership.
D. The evidence is biased and fails to consider alternative leadership strategies that do not involve cruelty.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Evaluation of evidence supporting the claim that cruelty is a necessary part of leadership based on psychological studies and historical examples.


Explanation:

The evidence used to support the claim that cruelty is a necessary part of leadership can be evaluated based on various psychological studies and historical examples. For instance, the Stanford Prison Experiment and the BBC prison study provide insights into how power dynamics can lead to cruelty in leadership roles. Additionally, historical examples show how leaders throughout history have used cruelty to maintain power, emphasizing the connection between power and exploitation.


Learn more about Cruelty in leadership here:

https://brainly.com/question/45023094


Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.