Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately from our dedicated community of professionals. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Which statement best evaluates the effectiveness of the evidence used to support the claim that cruelty is a necessary part of leadership?

A. The evidence effectively demonstrates that cruelty is sometimes necessary to maintain order and authority.
B. The evidence is insufficient and does not convincingly show that cruelty is necessary for leadership.
C. The evidence is well-chosen and illustrates historical examples where cruelty led to successful leadership.
D. The evidence is biased and fails to consider alternative leadership strategies that do not involve cruelty.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Evaluation of evidence supporting the claim that cruelty is a necessary part of leadership based on psychological studies and historical examples.


Explanation:

The evidence used to support the claim that cruelty is a necessary part of leadership can be evaluated based on various psychological studies and historical examples. For instance, the Stanford Prison Experiment and the BBC prison study provide insights into how power dynamics can lead to cruelty in leadership roles. Additionally, historical examples show how leaders throughout history have used cruelty to maintain power, emphasizing the connection between power and exploitation.


Learn more about Cruelty in leadership here:

https://brainly.com/question/45023094


We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.