Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Explore our Q&A platform to find reliable answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the given problem step by step to determine whether we should accept or reject the null hypothesis using the provided sample data.
### 1. Setting up the Hypotheses
The auto maker claims that the transmissions can last over 150,000 miles before failing.
- Null Hypothesis (\( H_0 \)): The mean number of miles before failure is 150,000 miles or less.
[tex]\[ H_0: \mu \leq 150,000 \][/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis (\( H_1 \)): The mean number of miles before failure is greater than 150,000 miles.
[tex]\[ H_1: \mu > 150,000 \][/tex]
### 2. Test Statistics and Critical Values
From the given data:
- Sample Mean (\( \bar{x} \)) = 150.7
- Hypothesized Mean (\( \mu_0 \)) = 150
- Sample Size (n) = 42
- Sample Variance = 4.551
- Degrees of Freedom (df) = 41
- t Stat = 2.17
- \( P(T \leq t) \) one-tail = 0.018
- t Critical one-tail = 1.683
- \( P(T \leq t) \) two-tail = 0.036
- t Critical two-tail = 2.02
### 3. One-Tailed Testing Decision
For a one-tailed test, we're interested in determining if the mean number of miles is greater than 150,000. Here are the rules for our decision-making process:
- If \( t \) Stat > t Critical one-tail
- If \( P \) value one-tail < 0.05
Given our data:
- t Stat = 2.17
- t Critical one-tail = 1.683
- \( P(T \leq t) \) one-tail = 0.018
#### Comparison:
- Since 2.17 > 1.683, we can reject the null hypothesis.
- Since 0.018 < 0.05, we can also reject the null hypothesis.
### 4. Two-Tailed Testing Decision
For completeness, let's also consider the two-tailed test, even though the claim was specifically for over 150,000 miles.
For a two-tailed test:
- If \( t \) Stat > t Critical two-tail
- If \( P \) value two-tail < 0.05
Given our data:
- t Stat = 2.17
- t Critical two-tail = 2.02
- \( P(T \leq t) \) two-tail = 0.036
#### Comparison:
- Since 2.17 > 2.02, we can reject the null hypothesis.
- Since 0.036 < 0.05, we can also reject the null hypothesis.
### 5. Conclusion
Based on the above analysis for both one-tailed and two-tailed testing, we have:
#### One-Tailed:
- Decision: Reject the null hypothesis.
#### Two-Tailed:
- Decision: Reject the null hypothesis.
### Final Decision:
The evidence from the sample data supports the claim that the transmissions can indeed last over 150,000 miles before failing. Therefore, based on both one-tailed and two-tailed tests, we reject the null hypothesis.
### 1. Setting up the Hypotheses
The auto maker claims that the transmissions can last over 150,000 miles before failing.
- Null Hypothesis (\( H_0 \)): The mean number of miles before failure is 150,000 miles or less.
[tex]\[ H_0: \mu \leq 150,000 \][/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis (\( H_1 \)): The mean number of miles before failure is greater than 150,000 miles.
[tex]\[ H_1: \mu > 150,000 \][/tex]
### 2. Test Statistics and Critical Values
From the given data:
- Sample Mean (\( \bar{x} \)) = 150.7
- Hypothesized Mean (\( \mu_0 \)) = 150
- Sample Size (n) = 42
- Sample Variance = 4.551
- Degrees of Freedom (df) = 41
- t Stat = 2.17
- \( P(T \leq t) \) one-tail = 0.018
- t Critical one-tail = 1.683
- \( P(T \leq t) \) two-tail = 0.036
- t Critical two-tail = 2.02
### 3. One-Tailed Testing Decision
For a one-tailed test, we're interested in determining if the mean number of miles is greater than 150,000. Here are the rules for our decision-making process:
- If \( t \) Stat > t Critical one-tail
- If \( P \) value one-tail < 0.05
Given our data:
- t Stat = 2.17
- t Critical one-tail = 1.683
- \( P(T \leq t) \) one-tail = 0.018
#### Comparison:
- Since 2.17 > 1.683, we can reject the null hypothesis.
- Since 0.018 < 0.05, we can also reject the null hypothesis.
### 4. Two-Tailed Testing Decision
For completeness, let's also consider the two-tailed test, even though the claim was specifically for over 150,000 miles.
For a two-tailed test:
- If \( t \) Stat > t Critical two-tail
- If \( P \) value two-tail < 0.05
Given our data:
- t Stat = 2.17
- t Critical two-tail = 2.02
- \( P(T \leq t) \) two-tail = 0.036
#### Comparison:
- Since 2.17 > 2.02, we can reject the null hypothesis.
- Since 0.036 < 0.05, we can also reject the null hypothesis.
### 5. Conclusion
Based on the above analysis for both one-tailed and two-tailed testing, we have:
#### One-Tailed:
- Decision: Reject the null hypothesis.
#### Two-Tailed:
- Decision: Reject the null hypothesis.
### Final Decision:
The evidence from the sample data supports the claim that the transmissions can indeed last over 150,000 miles before failing. Therefore, based on both one-tailed and two-tailed tests, we reject the null hypothesis.
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.