Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where experts provide clear and concise information on various topics. Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the given problem step-by-step.
First, we are given the original endpoints of a line segment:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \][/tex]
We are also told the resultant endpoints of the line segment after reflection:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, 3) \][/tex]
We need to determine which type of reflection will produce this image. We have four options to consider:
1. Reflection across the x-axis
2. Reflection across the y-axis
3. Reflection across the line \( y = x \)
4. Reflection across the line \( y = -x \)
Reflection across the x-axis:
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the x-axis is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (2, 3) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, 3) \][/tex]
These points match the resultant endpoints perfectly. Therefore, the reflection across the x-axis is the correct transformation.
Reflection across the y-axis:
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the y-axis is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (-3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (-3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (-2, -3) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Reflection across the line \( y = x \):
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the line \( y = x \) is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (y, x) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (2, 3) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (-3, 2) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (2, 3) \quad \text{and} \quad (-3, 2) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Reflection across the line \( y = -x \):
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the line \( y = -x \) is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-y, -x) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (3, -2) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (-2, -3) \quad \text{and} \quad (3, -2) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Therefore, the correct reflection that produces the image with endpoints \((3, -2)\) and \((2, 3)\) is the reflection across the x-axis. The answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{a reflection of the line segment across the } x\text{-axis}} \][/tex]
First, we are given the original endpoints of a line segment:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \][/tex]
We are also told the resultant endpoints of the line segment after reflection:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, 3) \][/tex]
We need to determine which type of reflection will produce this image. We have four options to consider:
1. Reflection across the x-axis
2. Reflection across the y-axis
3. Reflection across the line \( y = x \)
4. Reflection across the line \( y = -x \)
Reflection across the x-axis:
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the x-axis is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (2, 3) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, 3) \][/tex]
These points match the resultant endpoints perfectly. Therefore, the reflection across the x-axis is the correct transformation.
Reflection across the y-axis:
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the y-axis is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (-3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (-3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (-2, -3) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Reflection across the line \( y = x \):
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the line \( y = x \) is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (y, x) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (2, 3) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (-3, 2) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (2, 3) \quad \text{and} \quad (-3, 2) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Reflection across the line \( y = -x \):
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the line \( y = -x \) is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-y, -x) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (3, -2) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (-2, -3) \quad \text{and} \quad (3, -2) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Therefore, the correct reflection that produces the image with endpoints \((3, -2)\) and \((2, 3)\) is the reflection across the x-axis. The answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{a reflection of the line segment across the } x\text{-axis}} \][/tex]
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.