At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the given problem step-by-step.
First, we are given the original endpoints of a line segment:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \][/tex]
We are also told the resultant endpoints of the line segment after reflection:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, 3) \][/tex]
We need to determine which type of reflection will produce this image. We have four options to consider:
1. Reflection across the x-axis
2. Reflection across the y-axis
3. Reflection across the line \( y = x \)
4. Reflection across the line \( y = -x \)
Reflection across the x-axis:
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the x-axis is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (2, 3) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, 3) \][/tex]
These points match the resultant endpoints perfectly. Therefore, the reflection across the x-axis is the correct transformation.
Reflection across the y-axis:
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the y-axis is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (-3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (-3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (-2, -3) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Reflection across the line \( y = x \):
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the line \( y = x \) is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (y, x) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (2, 3) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (-3, 2) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (2, 3) \quad \text{and} \quad (-3, 2) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Reflection across the line \( y = -x \):
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the line \( y = -x \) is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-y, -x) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (3, -2) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (-2, -3) \quad \text{and} \quad (3, -2) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Therefore, the correct reflection that produces the image with endpoints \((3, -2)\) and \((2, 3)\) is the reflection across the x-axis. The answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{a reflection of the line segment across the } x\text{-axis}} \][/tex]
First, we are given the original endpoints of a line segment:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \][/tex]
We are also told the resultant endpoints of the line segment after reflection:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, 3) \][/tex]
We need to determine which type of reflection will produce this image. We have four options to consider:
1. Reflection across the x-axis
2. Reflection across the y-axis
3. Reflection across the line \( y = x \)
4. Reflection across the line \( y = -x \)
Reflection across the x-axis:
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the x-axis is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (2, 3) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, 3) \][/tex]
These points match the resultant endpoints perfectly. Therefore, the reflection across the x-axis is the correct transformation.
Reflection across the y-axis:
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the y-axis is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (-3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (-3, 2) \quad \text{and} \quad (-2, -3) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Reflection across the line \( y = x \):
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the line \( y = x \) is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (y, x) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (2, 3) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (-3, 2) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (2, 3) \quad \text{and} \quad (-3, 2) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Reflection across the line \( y = -x \):
The transformation rule for reflecting a point \((x, y)\) across the line \( y = -x \) is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-y, -x) \][/tex]
Applying this rule to our original points:
[tex]\[ (3, 2) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \quad \text{and} \quad (2, -3) \rightarrow (3, -2) \][/tex]
This gives us the points:
[tex]\[ (-2, -3) \quad \text{and} \quad (3, -2) \][/tex]
These points do not match the resultant endpoints.
Therefore, the correct reflection that produces the image with endpoints \((3, -2)\) and \((2, 3)\) is the reflection across the x-axis. The answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{a reflection of the line segment across the } x\text{-axis}} \][/tex]
We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.