Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine the value of \( R \) that most likely indicates an association between the conditional variables, let's perform a detailed analysis.
We are given the following table:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \cline { 2 - 5 } \multicolumn{1}{c|}{} & A & B & C & Total \\ \hline D & 0.12 & 0.78 & 0.10 & 1.0 \\ \hline E & R & S & T & 1.0 \\ \hline Total & U & X & Y & 1.0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
From the data provided:
- The totals for each column (A, B, and C) add up to the overall total of 1.0.
- The total of row D is 1.0.
- The total of row E is also 1.0, which means:
[tex]\[ R + S + T = 1.0 \][/tex]
### Step-by-Step Solution
#### Step 1: Identify values for A, B, and C
Each entry in the D row must sum up to 1.0:
- \( A_D = 0.12 \)
- \( A_B = 0.78 \)
- \( A_C = 0.10 \)
#### Step 2: Calculate \( R \)
We need to calculate the left-over value \( R \).
[tex]\[ A_D + A_B + A_C = 0.12 + 0.78 + 0.10 = 1.0 \][/tex]
Since \( A_D, A_B, \) and \( A_C \) together already sum to 1.0 under row D, the sum of row E \( (R, S, T) \) should individually make up 1.0:
Let’s look at the possible values of \( R \):
- If \( R = 0.09 \):
[tex]\[ R + S + T = 0.09 + S + T = 1.0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ S + T = 0.91 \][/tex]
- If \( R = 0.10 \):
[tex]\[ R + S + T = 0.10 + S + T = 1.0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ S + T = 0.90 \][/tex]
- If \( R = 0.13 \):
[tex]\[ R + S + T = 0.13 + S + T = 1.0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ S + T = 0.87 \][/tex]
- If \( R = 0.79 \):
[tex]\[ R + S + T = 0.79 + S + T = 1.0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ S + T = 0.21 \][/tex]
#### Step 3: Choose the value of \( R \) that shows a likely natural distribution
Since values for \( S \) and \( T \) need to sum to a much more naturally balanced distribution, let’s analyze according to the mixing of higher interdependencies:
Considering our odd distributions for the plausible values:
- \( R = 0.79 \) leaves \( S \) and \( T \) very low combined \( 0.21 \).
Detailly, \( R = 0.09, 0.10, 0.13 \) leaves the remainder of \( S \) and \( T \):
- Hence \( R = 0.09, 0.13 \) is more equally probable.
Thus, a normalized association highly advises \( R = 0.13 \).
### Conclusion
[tex]\( R = 0.13 \)[/tex] is the valuable distributional figure that seems explainably natural, showing an association amongst the variables.
We are given the following table:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \cline { 2 - 5 } \multicolumn{1}{c|}{} & A & B & C & Total \\ \hline D & 0.12 & 0.78 & 0.10 & 1.0 \\ \hline E & R & S & T & 1.0 \\ \hline Total & U & X & Y & 1.0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
From the data provided:
- The totals for each column (A, B, and C) add up to the overall total of 1.0.
- The total of row D is 1.0.
- The total of row E is also 1.0, which means:
[tex]\[ R + S + T = 1.0 \][/tex]
### Step-by-Step Solution
#### Step 1: Identify values for A, B, and C
Each entry in the D row must sum up to 1.0:
- \( A_D = 0.12 \)
- \( A_B = 0.78 \)
- \( A_C = 0.10 \)
#### Step 2: Calculate \( R \)
We need to calculate the left-over value \( R \).
[tex]\[ A_D + A_B + A_C = 0.12 + 0.78 + 0.10 = 1.0 \][/tex]
Since \( A_D, A_B, \) and \( A_C \) together already sum to 1.0 under row D, the sum of row E \( (R, S, T) \) should individually make up 1.0:
Let’s look at the possible values of \( R \):
- If \( R = 0.09 \):
[tex]\[ R + S + T = 0.09 + S + T = 1.0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ S + T = 0.91 \][/tex]
- If \( R = 0.10 \):
[tex]\[ R + S + T = 0.10 + S + T = 1.0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ S + T = 0.90 \][/tex]
- If \( R = 0.13 \):
[tex]\[ R + S + T = 0.13 + S + T = 1.0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ S + T = 0.87 \][/tex]
- If \( R = 0.79 \):
[tex]\[ R + S + T = 0.79 + S + T = 1.0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ S + T = 0.21 \][/tex]
#### Step 3: Choose the value of \( R \) that shows a likely natural distribution
Since values for \( S \) and \( T \) need to sum to a much more naturally balanced distribution, let’s analyze according to the mixing of higher interdependencies:
Considering our odd distributions for the plausible values:
- \( R = 0.79 \) leaves \( S \) and \( T \) very low combined \( 0.21 \).
Detailly, \( R = 0.09, 0.10, 0.13 \) leaves the remainder of \( S \) and \( T \):
- Hence \( R = 0.09, 0.13 \) is more equally probable.
Thus, a normalized association highly advises \( R = 0.13 \).
### Conclusion
[tex]\( R = 0.13 \)[/tex] is the valuable distributional figure that seems explainably natural, showing an association amongst the variables.
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.