Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where experts provide clear and concise information on various topics. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
We need to determine how many extraneous solutions the given equation has:
[tex]\[ \frac{9}{n^2+1} = \frac{n+3}{4} \][/tex]
First, let's eliminate the fractions by cross-multiplying:
[tex]\[ 9 \cdot 4 = (n^2 + 1)(n + 3) \][/tex]
This simplifies to:
[tex]\[ 36 = (n^2 + 1)(n + 3) \][/tex]
Next, we expand the right-hand side:
[tex]\[ 36 = n^3 + 3n^2 + n + 3 \][/tex]
Rearrange this equation to set it to 0:
[tex]\[ n^3 + 3n^2 + n + 3 - 36 = 0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ n^3 + 3n^2 + n - 33 = 0 \][/tex]
This is a cubic equation, and solving cubic equations typically requires finding roots either through factoring or using numerical methods. However, for the current goal let's evaluate potential simple rational roots using the Rational Root Theorem. According to this theorem, the rational roots of the polynomial are among the values:
[tex]\[ \pm 1, \pm 3, \pm 11, \pm 33 \][/tex]
We'll test these one by one to see which satisfy the original equation.
1. Testing \( n = 1 \):
[tex]\[ 1^3 + 3(1)^2 + 1 - 33 = 1 + 3 + 1 - 33 = -28 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
2. Testing \( n = -1 \):
[tex]\[ (-1)^3 + 3(-1)^2 + (-1) - 33 = -1 + 3 - 1 - 33 = -32 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
3. Testing \( n = 3 \):
[tex]\[ 3^3 + 3(3)^2 + 3 - 33 = 27 + 27 + 3 - 33 = 24 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
4. Testing \( n = -3 \):
[tex]\[ (-3)^3 + 3(-3)^2 + (-3) - 33 = -27 + 27 - 3 - 33 = -36 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
5. Testing \( n = 11 \):
[tex]\[ 11^3 + 3(11)^2 + 11 - 33 = 1331 + 363 + 11 - 33 = 1672 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
6. Testing \( n = -11 \):
[tex]\[ (-11)^3 + 3(-11)^2 + (-11) - 33 = -1331 + 363 - 11 - 33 = -1012 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
Since none of these rational roots solves the equation, we can solve the original equation numerically or symbolically to find the actual roots. After solving the cubic equation for the roots and substituting them back in the original equation:
It turns out there are no roots that satisfy the condition \( \frac{9}{n^2+1} = \frac{n+3}{4} \), which indicates there are no valid roots which means there are zero extraneous solutions.
Thus, the answer is:
[tex]\[ 0 \quad \text{extraneous solutions} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \frac{9}{n^2+1} = \frac{n+3}{4} \][/tex]
First, let's eliminate the fractions by cross-multiplying:
[tex]\[ 9 \cdot 4 = (n^2 + 1)(n + 3) \][/tex]
This simplifies to:
[tex]\[ 36 = (n^2 + 1)(n + 3) \][/tex]
Next, we expand the right-hand side:
[tex]\[ 36 = n^3 + 3n^2 + n + 3 \][/tex]
Rearrange this equation to set it to 0:
[tex]\[ n^3 + 3n^2 + n + 3 - 36 = 0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ n^3 + 3n^2 + n - 33 = 0 \][/tex]
This is a cubic equation, and solving cubic equations typically requires finding roots either through factoring or using numerical methods. However, for the current goal let's evaluate potential simple rational roots using the Rational Root Theorem. According to this theorem, the rational roots of the polynomial are among the values:
[tex]\[ \pm 1, \pm 3, \pm 11, \pm 33 \][/tex]
We'll test these one by one to see which satisfy the original equation.
1. Testing \( n = 1 \):
[tex]\[ 1^3 + 3(1)^2 + 1 - 33 = 1 + 3 + 1 - 33 = -28 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
2. Testing \( n = -1 \):
[tex]\[ (-1)^3 + 3(-1)^2 + (-1) - 33 = -1 + 3 - 1 - 33 = -32 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
3. Testing \( n = 3 \):
[tex]\[ 3^3 + 3(3)^2 + 3 - 33 = 27 + 27 + 3 - 33 = 24 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
4. Testing \( n = -3 \):
[tex]\[ (-3)^3 + 3(-3)^2 + (-3) - 33 = -27 + 27 - 3 - 33 = -36 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
5. Testing \( n = 11 \):
[tex]\[ 11^3 + 3(11)^2 + 11 - 33 = 1331 + 363 + 11 - 33 = 1672 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
6. Testing \( n = -11 \):
[tex]\[ (-11)^3 + 3(-11)^2 + (-11) - 33 = -1331 + 363 - 11 - 33 = -1012 \quad (\neq 0) \][/tex]
Since none of these rational roots solves the equation, we can solve the original equation numerically or symbolically to find the actual roots. After solving the cubic equation for the roots and substituting them back in the original equation:
It turns out there are no roots that satisfy the condition \( \frac{9}{n^2+1} = \frac{n+3}{4} \), which indicates there are no valid roots which means there are zero extraneous solutions.
Thus, the answer is:
[tex]\[ 0 \quad \text{extraneous solutions} \][/tex]
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.