Answered

Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

In Rome, what was the status of a work of art placed outside a building (where it could be seen by the public) by a private citizen?

A. It belonged to the public and could not be removed.
B. It belonged to the emperor, and he could take it if he wanted.
C. No one cared about it.
D. It was considered a nuisance and removed after a certain length of time.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In ancient Rome, public works of art placed outside by private citizens belonged to the public and served as political propaganda for emperors.


Explanation:

In ancient Rome, a work of art placed outside a building by a private citizen that could be seen by the public was generally considered as belonging to the public. These public works of art, whether sculptures or monuments, served as political propaganda and showcased the achievements of the emperor to all Romans. While private artworks were limited in audience and often displayed in more exclusive settings, public art aimed to reach a broader audience to convey specific messages.


Learn more about Roman art here:

https://brainly.com/question/972104


We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.