Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your ultimate destination for finding answers to a wide range of questions from experts. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

In Rome, what was the status of a work of art placed outside a building (where it could be seen by the public) by a private citizen?

A. It belonged to the public and could not be removed.
B. It belonged to the emperor, and he could take it if he wanted.
C. No one cared about it.
D. It was considered a nuisance and removed after a certain length of time.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In ancient Rome, public works of art placed outside by private citizens belonged to the public and served as political propaganda for emperors.


Explanation:

In ancient Rome, a work of art placed outside a building by a private citizen that could be seen by the public was generally considered as belonging to the public. These public works of art, whether sculptures or monuments, served as political propaganda and showcased the achievements of the emperor to all Romans. While private artworks were limited in audience and often displayed in more exclusive settings, public art aimed to reach a broader audience to convey specific messages.


Learn more about Roman art here:

https://brainly.com/question/972104


We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.