Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Problem Situation:
Bernie spends \(\$6.50\) on ingredients and cups for his lemonade stand.
He charges \(\$1.50\) for each cup of lemonade.
He will only sell whole cups of lemonade (not 0.75 cups, 1.5 cups, etc.).
How many cups, \(x\), will Bernie need to sell to make a profit of at least \(\$20\)?

Inequality that represents this situation:
[tex]\[
20 \leq 1.50x - 6.50
\][/tex]

Drag each number to show if it is a solution to both the inequality and the problem situation or to the inequality only, or if it is not a solution.

Numbers to consider:
- 18
- 23
- 10
- 17.7
- -4
- 35.5

Categories:
- Solution to both the inequality and the situation
- Solution to the inequality only
- Not a solution


Sagot :

To solve this problem, we need to determine whether the given numbers satisfy the inequality, and if they also represent whole non-negative numbers of cups sold by Bernie.

Let's first analyze the inequality we are given:
[tex]\[ 20 \leq 1.50x - 6.50 \][/tex]
To check if each number satisfies the inequality, we'll substitute each number into \( x \) and see if the inequality holds true.

Step-by-Step Analysis:

1. Check \( x = 18 \):
[tex]\[ 1.50 \times 18 - 6.50 = 27 - 6.50 = 20.50 \][/tex]
Since \( 20 \leq 20.50 \), \( x = 18 \) satisfies the inequality.
- It is a non-negative integer, hence it is a solution to both the inequality and the situation.

2. Check \( x = 23 \):
[tex]\[ 1.50 \times 23 - 6.50 = 34.50 - 6.50 = 28 \][/tex]
Since \( 20 \leq 28 \), \( x = 23 \) satisfies the inequality.
- It is a non-negative integer, hence it is a solution to both the inequality and the situation.

3. Check \( x = 10 \):
[tex]\[ 1.50 \times 10 - 6.50 = 15 - 6.50 = 8.50 \][/tex]
Since \( 20 \leq 8.50 \) is false, \( x = 10 \) does not satisfy the inequality.
- It is not a solution.

4. Check \( x = 17.7 \):
[tex]\[ 1.50 \times 17.7 - 6.50 = 26.55 - 6.50 = 20.05 \][/tex]
Since \( 20 \leq 20.05 \), \( x = 17.7 \) satisfies the inequality.
- It is not a whole number (cups sold must be integer), so it is a solution to the inequality only.

5. Check \( x = -4 \):
[tex]\[ 1.50 \times -4 - 6.50 = -6 - 6.50 = -12.50 \][/tex]
Since \( 20 \leq -12.50 \) is false, \( x = -4 \) does not satisfy the inequality.
- It is not a solution.

6. Check \( x = 35.5 \):
[tex]\[ 1.50 \times 35.5 - 6.50 = 53.25 - 6.50 = 46.75 \][/tex]
Since \( 20 \leq 46.75 \), \( x = 35.5 \) satisfies the inequality.
- It is not a whole number (cups sold must be integer), so it is a solution to the inequality only.

Summary of Classification:

- Solution to both the inequality and the situation:
- 18, 23

- Solution to the inequality only:
- 17.7, 35.5

- Not a solution:
- 10, -4

Thus, we can classify each number as follows:

- Solution to both the inequality and the problem situation: 18, 23
- Solution to the inequality only: 17.7, 35.5
- Not a solution: 10, -4