Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Prove: [tex]m_c = m_d[/tex]

Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.

Statements:
1. [tex]c \parallel d[/tex]
2. [tex]c = m_c x + b_c[/tex]
3. [tex]d = m_d x + b_d[/tex]
4.
[tex]\[
\begin{array}{l}
m_c x + b_c = m_d x + b_d \\
m_c x - m_d x = b_d - b_c \\
x(m_c - m_d) = b_d - b_c \\
x = \frac{b_d - b_c}{m_c - m_d} \\
m_c - m_d = 0 \\
m_c = m_d
\end{array}
\][/tex]

Reasons:
1. given
2. write equations for lines [tex]c[/tex] and [tex]d[/tex]
3. solve for [tex]x[/tex]
4. subtraction property of equality
5. distributive property
6. division property of equality
7. [tex]x[/tex] does not exist; therefore, the denominator must be 0
8. addition property of equality

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer
Let's go through the detailed, step-by-step solution to prove \( m_c = m_d \):

1. Given:
[tex]\[ c \parallel d \][/tex]
Reason: given

2. Write equations for lines \( c \) and \( d \):
[tex]\[ c = m_c x + b_c \][/tex]
[tex]\[ d = m_d x + b_d \][/tex]
Reason: write equations for lines \( c \) and \( d \)

3. Set the equations equal to each other since they are parallel:
[tex]\[ m_c x + b_c = m_d x + b_d \][/tex]
Reason: addition property of equality

4. Subtract the terms involving \( b \) and \( m \) from both sides to isolate the \( x \) terms on one side:
[tex]\[ m_c x - m_d x = b_d - b_c \][/tex]
Reason: subtraction property of equality

5. Factor out \( x \) on the left-hand side:
[tex]\[ x (m_c - m_d) = b_d - b_c \][/tex]
Reason: distributive property

6. Solve for \( x \). However, parallel lines imply they never intersect, meaning \( x \) does not exist:
[tex]\[ x = \frac{b_d - b_c}{m_c - m_d} \][/tex]
Since \( x \) does not exist, the equation must be invalid, leading to an explanation:
Reason: division property of equality

7. Since \( x \) does not exist, the denominator must be 0:
[tex]\[ m_c - m_d = 0 \][/tex]
Reason: \( x \) does not exist; therefore, the denominator must be 0

8. Conclude from the last step:
[tex]\[ m_c = m_d \][/tex]
Reason: addition property of equality

So, to summarize:

Statements:
1. \(c \parallel d\)
2. \(c = m_c x + b_c \)
3. \(d = m_d x + b_d \)
4. \(m_c x + b_c = m_d x + b_d\)
5. \(m_c x - m_d x = b_d - b_c\)
6. \( x (m_c - m_d) = b_d - b_c \)
7. \( x = \frac{b_d - b_c}{m_c - m_d}\)
8. \(m_c - m_d = 0\)
9. \(m_c = m_d\)

Reasons:
1. given
2. write equations for lines \(c\) and \(d\)
3. addition property of equality
4. subtraction property of equality
5. distributive property
6. division property of equality
7. \( x \) does not exist; therefore, the denominator must be 0
8. addition property of equality
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.