Answered

At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Which of the following cases set a precedent for the mandatory duty to warn?

A. Brown v. Board of Education
B. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California
C. Jones v. State of Maryland
D. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Brown v. Board of Education set precedent for mandatory duty to warn in Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California.


Explanation:

Brown v. Board of Education set a precedent for mandatory duty to warn in the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California. In this case, the California Supreme Court ruled that therapists have an obligation to warn potential victims if a client poses a danger to the public.

Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California highlighted the legal and ethical responsibilities of therapists, marking a significant development in the duty to warn requirements for mental health professionals.


Learn more about Precedent for mandatory duty to warn here:

https://brainly.com/question/37484832


We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.