Answered

Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Explore in-depth answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts across different fields. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Which of the following cases set a precedent for the mandatory duty to warn?

A. Brown v. Board of Education
B. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California
C. Jones v. State of Maryland
D. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Brown v. Board of Education set precedent for mandatory duty to warn in Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California.


Explanation:

Brown v. Board of Education set a precedent for mandatory duty to warn in the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California. In this case, the California Supreme Court ruled that therapists have an obligation to warn potential victims if a client poses a danger to the public.

Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California highlighted the legal and ethical responsibilities of therapists, marking a significant development in the duty to warn requirements for mental health professionals.


Learn more about Precedent for mandatory duty to warn here:

https://brainly.com/question/37484832


Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.