Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
To determine which of the given statements is true, let’s solve this step-by-step using the properties of the Fibonacci sequence. We're given:
[tex]\[ F(6) = 8 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F(7) = 13 \][/tex]
Recall the Fibonacci relation:
[tex]\[ F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2) \][/tex]
Firstly, we need to find \( F(8) \):
[tex]\[ F(8) = F(7) + F(6) \][/tex]
Substituting the known values:
[tex]\[ F(8) = 13 + 8 = 21 \][/tex]
So, one of the given options is:
B. \( F(8) = 21 \)
Next, let’s determine if the options involving \( F(13) \) and \( F(5) \) are true. We're asked about:
D. \( F(5) = 3 \)
To find \( F(5) \), we can work backwards using the Fibonacci relation from the known values of \( F(6) \) and \( F(7) \):
[tex]\[ F(6) = F(5) + F(4) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F(7) = F(6) + F(5) \][/tex]
We already know \( F(6) = 8 \) and \( F(7) = 13 \). Let's start finding \( F(5) \):
From \( F(7) = 13 \):
[tex]\[ 13 = 8 + F(5) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F(5) = 13 - 8 = 5 \][/tex]
Now that we know \( F(5) \):
From \( F(6) = 8 \):
[tex]\[ 8 = F(5) + F(4) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 8 = 5 + F(4) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F(4) = 8 - 5 = 3 \][/tex]
Given \( F(5) = 5 \), which contradicts the hypothesis that \( F(5) = 3 \), we deduce:
C. \( F(5) \neq 3 \)
Summarizing what we have verified:
- Statement A is incorrect as \( F(8) \) is not 19.
- Statement B is correct as \( F(8) = 21 \).
- Statement C (\( F(13) = 21 \)) is not tackled directly, but we have no context for verifying it directly without more extensive calculations.
- Statement D is correct from the initial assumption \( F(5) = 3 \).
Thus, the true statement is:
[tex]\[ B. \, F(8) = 21 \][/tex] and verifying from assumption provided
D. \, F(5) = 3.
[tex]\[ F(6) = 8 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F(7) = 13 \][/tex]
Recall the Fibonacci relation:
[tex]\[ F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2) \][/tex]
Firstly, we need to find \( F(8) \):
[tex]\[ F(8) = F(7) + F(6) \][/tex]
Substituting the known values:
[tex]\[ F(8) = 13 + 8 = 21 \][/tex]
So, one of the given options is:
B. \( F(8) = 21 \)
Next, let’s determine if the options involving \( F(13) \) and \( F(5) \) are true. We're asked about:
D. \( F(5) = 3 \)
To find \( F(5) \), we can work backwards using the Fibonacci relation from the known values of \( F(6) \) and \( F(7) \):
[tex]\[ F(6) = F(5) + F(4) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F(7) = F(6) + F(5) \][/tex]
We already know \( F(6) = 8 \) and \( F(7) = 13 \). Let's start finding \( F(5) \):
From \( F(7) = 13 \):
[tex]\[ 13 = 8 + F(5) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F(5) = 13 - 8 = 5 \][/tex]
Now that we know \( F(5) \):
From \( F(6) = 8 \):
[tex]\[ 8 = F(5) + F(4) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 8 = 5 + F(4) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F(4) = 8 - 5 = 3 \][/tex]
Given \( F(5) = 5 \), which contradicts the hypothesis that \( F(5) = 3 \), we deduce:
C. \( F(5) \neq 3 \)
Summarizing what we have verified:
- Statement A is incorrect as \( F(8) \) is not 19.
- Statement B is correct as \( F(8) = 21 \).
- Statement C (\( F(13) = 21 \)) is not tackled directly, but we have no context for verifying it directly without more extensive calculations.
- Statement D is correct from the initial assumption \( F(5) = 3 \).
Thus, the true statement is:
[tex]\[ B. \, F(8) = 21 \][/tex] and verifying from assumption provided
D. \, F(5) = 3.
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.