At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
For this assignment, you will write a 400-450 word discussion on the question posted below. You must include supportive evidence from your readings in your discussion. Make sure you properly cite your material when using quotes from your reading material.
When you are finished answering the question, you will need to respond to one of your peers' discussions and write a 150-word response to it to earn full credit. You can only see others' discussions once you have answered the question and posted it below.
**The timeline covered in this area of the survey is vast—c. 32,000 BCE (Chauvet Caves) to 7,000 BCE (Neolithic settlements)—but the question that unites this vast chronology is simple and compelling: What can we find out about objects from so long ago, and how do they connect to our contemporary experiences today?**
An object like the Woman of Willendorf can tell us about how the female form was viewed culturally, as this isn't an exact replication of what we know Homo sapien women looked like at this time. Although she's been canonized in the art history survey, she's really not that unique—many similar figures have been found from this era. Her body has been changed to accentuate certain characteristics. Why? Most of the figures from the "Upper Paleolithic period" are women. Women bear children, and she seems well-nourished—this may have ensured the continuation of the community. She's also a portable object. This makes sense as prehistoric communities were nomadic and needed to be able to carry their possessions with them.
