Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Obscenity:

A. Has been given constitutional protection.
B. Was effectively defined by the Supreme Court in Miller v. California.
C. Is considered legal free expression.
D. Can be illegal if it is found to violate a four-part test established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. California.
E. Was effectively defined by the Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman.


Sagot :

Final answer:

Obscenity, as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. California, is not protected by the First Amendment and is determined through the Miller Test.


Explanation:

Obscenity is a concept that is not protected by the First Amendment, but its definition has been established by the Supreme Court in Miller v. California. The Court set forth a three-part test known as the Miller Test to determine if something is obscene, incorporating criteria like appealing to prurient interests and lacking serious value.


Learn more about Obscenity and the Miller Test here:

https://brainly.com/question/38067329