Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Obscenity:

A. Has been given constitutional protection.
B. Was effectively defined by the Supreme Court in Miller v. California.
C. Is considered legal free expression.
D. Can be illegal if it is found to violate a four-part test established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. California.
E. Was effectively defined by the Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman.


Sagot :

Final answer:

Obscenity, as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. California, is not protected by the First Amendment and is determined through the Miller Test.


Explanation:

Obscenity is a concept that is not protected by the First Amendment, but its definition has been established by the Supreme Court in Miller v. California. The Court set forth a three-part test known as the Miller Test to determine if something is obscene, incorporating criteria like appealing to prurient interests and lacking serious value.


Learn more about Obscenity and the Miller Test here:

https://brainly.com/question/38067329