Welcome to Westonci.ca, your ultimate destination for finding answers to a wide range of questions from experts. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To solve this problem, we need to understand the logical structure described by the statement: "If \( x \Rightarrow y \) and \( y \Rightarrow z \), then \( x \Rightarrow z \)".
Let's break it down:
1. Implication:
- \( x \Rightarrow y \) means "if \( x \) then \( y \)"
- \( y \Rightarrow z \) means "if \( y \) then \( z \)"
2. Transitivity:
- If \( x \) implies \( y \), and \( y \) implies \( z \), then it logically follows that \( x \) implies \( z \).
The structure of this logic is a classic example of a syllogism. A syllogism is a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two given or assumed propositions (premises). Each premise shares a common term with the conclusion, which in this case are the logical implications linking \( x \), \( y \), and \( z \).
To clarify why the other options are incorrect:
- Inverse statement: This refers to negating both the hypothesis and the conclusion of an implication (i.e., if \( x \Rightarrow y \), the inverse is \( \neg x \Rightarrow \neg y \)).
- Converse statement: This swaps the hypothesis and conclusion of an implication (i.e., if \( x \Rightarrow y \), the converse is \( y \Rightarrow x \)).
- Contrapositive statement: This refers to negating and swapping the hypothesis and conclusion (i.e., if \( x \Rightarrow y \), the contrapositive is \( \neg y \Rightarrow \neg x \)).
Since none of these terms correctly describe the given logical structure, the best term is indeed "syllogism".
Hence, the correct answer is:
C. A syllogism
Let's break it down:
1. Implication:
- \( x \Rightarrow y \) means "if \( x \) then \( y \)"
- \( y \Rightarrow z \) means "if \( y \) then \( z \)"
2. Transitivity:
- If \( x \) implies \( y \), and \( y \) implies \( z \), then it logically follows that \( x \) implies \( z \).
The structure of this logic is a classic example of a syllogism. A syllogism is a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two given or assumed propositions (premises). Each premise shares a common term with the conclusion, which in this case are the logical implications linking \( x \), \( y \), and \( z \).
To clarify why the other options are incorrect:
- Inverse statement: This refers to negating both the hypothesis and the conclusion of an implication (i.e., if \( x \Rightarrow y \), the inverse is \( \neg x \Rightarrow \neg y \)).
- Converse statement: This swaps the hypothesis and conclusion of an implication (i.e., if \( x \Rightarrow y \), the converse is \( y \Rightarrow x \)).
- Contrapositive statement: This refers to negating and swapping the hypothesis and conclusion (i.e., if \( x \Rightarrow y \), the contrapositive is \( \neg y \Rightarrow \neg x \)).
Since none of these terms correctly describe the given logical structure, the best term is indeed "syllogism".
Hence, the correct answer is:
C. A syllogism
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.