Answered

Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across different disciplines on our comprehensive platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

1. Thomas Hobbes had a viewpoint that human beings are nasty and brutish. John Locke's writing indicates he had a more favorable view of human nature. Who do you agree with? Why?

2. Would you kill a random person for one billion dollars if there was no way you could get caught? What does your answer tell you about human nature?

3. At the end of

(Note: The third question appears to be incomplete and should be reviewed for clarity or completion.)

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Hobbes and Locke disagreed on human nature; Hobbes saw it as self-interested and chaotic, while Locke viewed it as rational and rights-driven.


Explanation:

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke held contrasting views on human nature.

Hobbes believed humans were inherently self-interested and needed a strong central authority to prevent chaos. He depicted life in the state of nature as harsh and violent, where individuals would compete for survival.

On the other hand, Locke saw humans as inherently rational and believed in natural rights like life, liberty, and property. He proposed a social contract to protect these rights and ensure societal order.


Learn more about philosophy of human nature here:

https://brainly.com/question/41493651


Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.