Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

1. Thomas Hobbes had a viewpoint that human beings are nasty and brutish. John Locke's writing indicates he had a more favorable view of human nature. Who do you agree with? Why?

2. Would you kill a random person for one billion dollars if there was no way you could get caught? What does your answer tell you about human nature?

3. At the end of

(Note: The third question appears to be incomplete and should be reviewed for clarity or completion.)

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Hobbes and Locke disagreed on human nature; Hobbes saw it as self-interested and chaotic, while Locke viewed it as rational and rights-driven.


Explanation:

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke held contrasting views on human nature.

Hobbes believed humans were inherently self-interested and needed a strong central authority to prevent chaos. He depicted life in the state of nature as harsh and violent, where individuals would compete for survival.

On the other hand, Locke saw humans as inherently rational and believed in natural rights like life, liberty, and property. He proposed a social contract to protect these rights and ensure societal order.


Learn more about philosophy of human nature here:

https://brainly.com/question/41493651


We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.