Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
To start with, let's list the data provided:
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 228 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 210 \)
Next, we will calculate the sample proportions:
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_A \)):
[tex]\[ p_A = \frac{228}{250} = 0.912 \][/tex]
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_B \)):
[tex]\[ p_B = \frac{210}{250} = 0.84 \][/tex]
Now, we need to determine the correct hypotheses to test the company's claim that the new formula (detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]) cleans better than the original formula (detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]):
1. Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): This is typically a statement of no effect or no difference. In this context, the null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher between the two detergents. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \][/tex]
2. Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): This is what we are trying to find evidence for. In this context, the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher is greater for detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] than for detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Comparing this to the given options:
1. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \)
2. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
3. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B \neq 0 \)
4. \( H_0: p_A - p_B > 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
The correct hypotheses according to the context of this problem are:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is the first option:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 228 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 210 \)
Next, we will calculate the sample proportions:
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_A \)):
[tex]\[ p_A = \frac{228}{250} = 0.912 \][/tex]
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_B \)):
[tex]\[ p_B = \frac{210}{250} = 0.84 \][/tex]
Now, we need to determine the correct hypotheses to test the company's claim that the new formula (detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]) cleans better than the original formula (detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]):
1. Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): This is typically a statement of no effect or no difference. In this context, the null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher between the two detergents. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \][/tex]
2. Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): This is what we are trying to find evidence for. In this context, the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher is greater for detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] than for detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Comparing this to the given options:
1. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \)
2. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
3. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B \neq 0 \)
4. \( H_0: p_A - p_B > 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
The correct hypotheses according to the context of this problem are:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is the first option:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.