Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals on our platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To start with, let's list the data provided:
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 228 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 210 \)
Next, we will calculate the sample proportions:
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_A \)):
[tex]\[ p_A = \frac{228}{250} = 0.912 \][/tex]
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_B \)):
[tex]\[ p_B = \frac{210}{250} = 0.84 \][/tex]
Now, we need to determine the correct hypotheses to test the company's claim that the new formula (detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]) cleans better than the original formula (detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]):
1. Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): This is typically a statement of no effect or no difference. In this context, the null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher between the two detergents. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \][/tex]
2. Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): This is what we are trying to find evidence for. In this context, the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher is greater for detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] than for detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Comparing this to the given options:
1. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \)
2. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
3. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B \neq 0 \)
4. \( H_0: p_A - p_B > 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
The correct hypotheses according to the context of this problem are:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is the first option:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 228 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 210 \)
Next, we will calculate the sample proportions:
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_A \)):
[tex]\[ p_A = \frac{228}{250} = 0.912 \][/tex]
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_B \)):
[tex]\[ p_B = \frac{210}{250} = 0.84 \][/tex]
Now, we need to determine the correct hypotheses to test the company's claim that the new formula (detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]) cleans better than the original formula (detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]):
1. Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): This is typically a statement of no effect or no difference. In this context, the null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher between the two detergents. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \][/tex]
2. Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): This is what we are trying to find evidence for. In this context, the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher is greater for detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] than for detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Comparing this to the given options:
1. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \)
2. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
3. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B \neq 0 \)
4. \( H_0: p_A - p_B > 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
The correct hypotheses according to the context of this problem are:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is the first option:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.