Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To start with, let's list the data provided:
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 228 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 210 \)
Next, we will calculate the sample proportions:
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_A \)):
[tex]\[ p_A = \frac{228}{250} = 0.912 \][/tex]
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_B \)):
[tex]\[ p_B = \frac{210}{250} = 0.84 \][/tex]
Now, we need to determine the correct hypotheses to test the company's claim that the new formula (detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]) cleans better than the original formula (detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]):
1. Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): This is typically a statement of no effect or no difference. In this context, the null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher between the two detergents. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \][/tex]
2. Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): This is what we are trying to find evidence for. In this context, the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher is greater for detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] than for detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Comparing this to the given options:
1. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \)
2. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
3. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B \neq 0 \)
4. \( H_0: p_A - p_B > 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
The correct hypotheses according to the context of this problem are:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is the first option:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing tested with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 250 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]: \( 228 \)
- Number of pieces of clothing receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]: \( 210 \)
Next, we will calculate the sample proportions:
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_A \)):
[tex]\[ p_A = \frac{228}{250} = 0.912 \][/tex]
- Sample proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher with detergent [tex]$B$[/tex] (denoted as \( p_B \)):
[tex]\[ p_B = \frac{210}{250} = 0.84 \][/tex]
Now, we need to determine the correct hypotheses to test the company's claim that the new formula (detergent [tex]$A$[/tex]) cleans better than the original formula (detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]):
1. Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): This is typically a statement of no effect or no difference. In this context, the null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher between the two detergents. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \][/tex]
2. Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): This is what we are trying to find evidence for. In this context, the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of clothes receiving a rating of 7 or higher is greater for detergent [tex]$A$[/tex] than for detergent [tex]$B$[/tex]. Mathematically, we express this as:
[tex]\[ H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Comparing this to the given options:
1. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \)
2. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
3. \( H_0: p_A - p_B = 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B \neq 0 \)
4. \( H_0: p_A - p_B > 0 \) and \( H_a: p_A - p_B < 0 \)
The correct hypotheses according to the context of this problem are:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is the first option:
[tex]\[ H_0: p_A - p_B = 0, \quad H_a: p_A - p_B > 0 \][/tex]
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.