At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Find reliable answers to your questions from a wide community of knowledgeable experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
To determine the correct representation of the position vector [tex]\( \vec{r} \)[/tex] of a point in the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane, let's examine each option and the given plane.
The [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane is defined by the fact that any point on this plane has its [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate equal to zero. This matches our intuitive understanding that the plane formed by the [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( z \)[/tex] axes does not involve any displacement in the [tex]\( y \)[/tex] direction.
Let's analyze each option:
- Option A: [tex]\( \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + y \hat{j} \)[/tex]
In this expression, the vector [tex]\( \vec{r} \)[/tex] has both [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \)[/tex] components. Since points on the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane have no [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate, this representation cannot be correct.
- Option B: [tex]\( \vec{r} = y \hat{i} + z \hat{k} \)[/tex]
Here, the vector [tex]\( \vec{r} \)[/tex] has components in the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]- and [tex]\( z \)[/tex]-directions. However, in the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane, positions are not defined by [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinates. Therefore, this option is also incorrect.
- Option C: [tex]\( \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + y \hat{j} + z \hat{k} \)[/tex]
This option includes components in all three directions: [tex]\( x \)[/tex], [tex]\( y \)[/tex], and [tex]\( z \)[/tex]. Since we are specifically looking for the position vector in the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane where [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is always zero, this expression is too general.
- Option D: [tex]\( \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + z \hat{k} \)[/tex]
Finally, this option gives the position vector in terms of just the [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( z \)[/tex] components, with no [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-component. This correctly represents the position of a point in the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane.
Given the constraints of the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane, Option D: [tex]\( \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + z \hat{k} \)[/tex] correctly and succinctly represents the position vector of a point on this plane.
Thus, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + z \hat{k} \][/tex]
The [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane is defined by the fact that any point on this plane has its [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate equal to zero. This matches our intuitive understanding that the plane formed by the [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( z \)[/tex] axes does not involve any displacement in the [tex]\( y \)[/tex] direction.
Let's analyze each option:
- Option A: [tex]\( \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + y \hat{j} \)[/tex]
In this expression, the vector [tex]\( \vec{r} \)[/tex] has both [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \)[/tex] components. Since points on the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane have no [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate, this representation cannot be correct.
- Option B: [tex]\( \vec{r} = y \hat{i} + z \hat{k} \)[/tex]
Here, the vector [tex]\( \vec{r} \)[/tex] has components in the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]- and [tex]\( z \)[/tex]-directions. However, in the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane, positions are not defined by [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinates. Therefore, this option is also incorrect.
- Option C: [tex]\( \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + y \hat{j} + z \hat{k} \)[/tex]
This option includes components in all three directions: [tex]\( x \)[/tex], [tex]\( y \)[/tex], and [tex]\( z \)[/tex]. Since we are specifically looking for the position vector in the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane where [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is always zero, this expression is too general.
- Option D: [tex]\( \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + z \hat{k} \)[/tex]
Finally, this option gives the position vector in terms of just the [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( z \)[/tex] components, with no [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-component. This correctly represents the position of a point in the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane.
Given the constraints of the [tex]\( xz \)[/tex]-plane, Option D: [tex]\( \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + z \hat{k} \)[/tex] correctly and succinctly represents the position vector of a point on this plane.
Thus, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + z \hat{k} \][/tex]
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.