Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Discover a wealth of knowledge from experts across different disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
To solve the equation [tex]\( \frac{1}{2} x^3 + x - 7 = -3 \sqrt{x - 1} \)[/tex] using successive approximation, we will follow the steps required for this method:
### 1. Set Up the Function
First, we rewrite the given equation in a form suitable for successive approximation. This involves isolating [tex]\( x \)[/tex] on one side of the equation. We can rewrite the equation as:
[tex]\[ x = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Let's denote this new function as:
[tex]\[ g(x) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
### 2. Initial Guess
Using the graph provided, we choose an initial approximation. An initial guess that is around [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex] seems reasonable.
Let:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
### 3. Perform Iterations
We perform three iterations of the successive approximation method.
First Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_1 = g(x_0) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{3 - 1} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot 3^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Calculating this, we get:
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx (1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i) \][/tex]
(Note: This value is complex since the square root of a negative number is involved.)
Second Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g(x_1) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_1 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g\left(1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i\right) \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
Third Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g(x_2) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_2 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g\left(1.2572 - 0.0492i\right) \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
### 4. Conclusion
After performing three iterations, the approximations we have obtained are:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx 1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_2 \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_3 \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
Therefore, the successive approximations suggest that the solutions are complex numbers after the initial step. This could be due to the nature of the function and the iterative process undertaken.
### 1. Set Up the Function
First, we rewrite the given equation in a form suitable for successive approximation. This involves isolating [tex]\( x \)[/tex] on one side of the equation. We can rewrite the equation as:
[tex]\[ x = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Let's denote this new function as:
[tex]\[ g(x) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
### 2. Initial Guess
Using the graph provided, we choose an initial approximation. An initial guess that is around [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex] seems reasonable.
Let:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
### 3. Perform Iterations
We perform three iterations of the successive approximation method.
First Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_1 = g(x_0) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{3 - 1} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot 3^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Calculating this, we get:
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx (1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i) \][/tex]
(Note: This value is complex since the square root of a negative number is involved.)
Second Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g(x_1) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_1 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g\left(1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i\right) \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
Third Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g(x_2) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_2 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g\left(1.2572 - 0.0492i\right) \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
### 4. Conclusion
After performing three iterations, the approximations we have obtained are:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx 1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_2 \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_3 \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
Therefore, the successive approximations suggest that the solutions are complex numbers after the initial step. This could be due to the nature of the function and the iterative process undertaken.
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.