Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Discover comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To solve the equation [tex]\( \frac{1}{2} x^3 + x - 7 = -3 \sqrt{x - 1} \)[/tex] using successive approximation, we will follow the steps required for this method:
### 1. Set Up the Function
First, we rewrite the given equation in a form suitable for successive approximation. This involves isolating [tex]\( x \)[/tex] on one side of the equation. We can rewrite the equation as:
[tex]\[ x = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Let's denote this new function as:
[tex]\[ g(x) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
### 2. Initial Guess
Using the graph provided, we choose an initial approximation. An initial guess that is around [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex] seems reasonable.
Let:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
### 3. Perform Iterations
We perform three iterations of the successive approximation method.
First Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_1 = g(x_0) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{3 - 1} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot 3^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Calculating this, we get:
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx (1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i) \][/tex]
(Note: This value is complex since the square root of a negative number is involved.)
Second Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g(x_1) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_1 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g\left(1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i\right) \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
Third Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g(x_2) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_2 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g\left(1.2572 - 0.0492i\right) \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
### 4. Conclusion
After performing three iterations, the approximations we have obtained are:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx 1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_2 \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_3 \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
Therefore, the successive approximations suggest that the solutions are complex numbers after the initial step. This could be due to the nature of the function and the iterative process undertaken.
### 1. Set Up the Function
First, we rewrite the given equation in a form suitable for successive approximation. This involves isolating [tex]\( x \)[/tex] on one side of the equation. We can rewrite the equation as:
[tex]\[ x = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Let's denote this new function as:
[tex]\[ g(x) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
### 2. Initial Guess
Using the graph provided, we choose an initial approximation. An initial guess that is around [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex] seems reasonable.
Let:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
### 3. Perform Iterations
We perform three iterations of the successive approximation method.
First Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_1 = g(x_0) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{3 - 1} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot 3^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Calculating this, we get:
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx (1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i) \][/tex]
(Note: This value is complex since the square root of a negative number is involved.)
Second Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g(x_1) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_1 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g\left(1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i\right) \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
Third Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g(x_2) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_2 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g\left(1.2572 - 0.0492i\right) \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
### 4. Conclusion
After performing three iterations, the approximations we have obtained are:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx 1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_2 \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_3 \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
Therefore, the successive approximations suggest that the solutions are complex numbers after the initial step. This could be due to the nature of the function and the iterative process undertaken.
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.