Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Experience the ease of finding quick and accurate answers to your questions from professionals on our platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To solve the equation [tex]\( \frac{1}{2} x^3 + x - 7 = -3 \sqrt{x - 1} \)[/tex] using successive approximation, we will follow the steps required for this method:
### 1. Set Up the Function
First, we rewrite the given equation in a form suitable for successive approximation. This involves isolating [tex]\( x \)[/tex] on one side of the equation. We can rewrite the equation as:
[tex]\[ x = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Let's denote this new function as:
[tex]\[ g(x) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
### 2. Initial Guess
Using the graph provided, we choose an initial approximation. An initial guess that is around [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex] seems reasonable.
Let:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
### 3. Perform Iterations
We perform three iterations of the successive approximation method.
First Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_1 = g(x_0) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{3 - 1} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot 3^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Calculating this, we get:
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx (1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i) \][/tex]
(Note: This value is complex since the square root of a negative number is involved.)
Second Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g(x_1) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_1 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g\left(1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i\right) \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
Third Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g(x_2) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_2 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g\left(1.2572 - 0.0492i\right) \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
### 4. Conclusion
After performing three iterations, the approximations we have obtained are:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx 1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_2 \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_3 \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
Therefore, the successive approximations suggest that the solutions are complex numbers after the initial step. This could be due to the nature of the function and the iterative process undertaken.
### 1. Set Up the Function
First, we rewrite the given equation in a form suitable for successive approximation. This involves isolating [tex]\( x \)[/tex] on one side of the equation. We can rewrite the equation as:
[tex]\[ x = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Let's denote this new function as:
[tex]\[ g(x) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{x - 1} - \frac{1}{2} x^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
### 2. Initial Guess
Using the graph provided, we choose an initial approximation. An initial guess that is around [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex] seems reasonable.
Let:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
### 3. Perform Iterations
We perform three iterations of the successive approximation method.
First Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_1 = g(x_0) = \left( \frac{7 - 3 \sqrt{3 - 1} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot 3^3}{3} \right)^{1/2} \][/tex]
Calculating this, we get:
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx (1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i) \][/tex]
(Note: This value is complex since the square root of a negative number is involved.)
Second Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g(x_1) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_1 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_2 = g\left(1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i\right) \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
Third Iteration:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g(x_2) \][/tex]
Substitute [tex]\( x_2 \)[/tex] into the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ x_3 = g\left(1.2572 - 0.0492i\right) \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
### 4. Conclusion
After performing three iterations, the approximations we have obtained are:
[tex]\[ x_0 = 3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_1 \approx 1.1587 \times 10^{-16} + 1.8923i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_2 \approx 1.2572 - 0.0492i \][/tex]
[tex]\[ x_3 \approx 1.2229 + 0.0356i \][/tex]
Therefore, the successive approximations suggest that the solutions are complex numbers after the initial step. This could be due to the nature of the function and the iterative process undertaken.
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.