Looking for trustworthy answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine which numbers from the provided list are equivalent to the mixed number [tex]\(3 \frac{2}{9}\)[/tex], let's convert [tex]\(3 \frac{2}{9}\)[/tex] into an improper fraction and then into a decimal.
1. Convert [tex]\(3 \frac{2}{9}\)[/tex] to an improper fraction:
- The whole number part is 3.
- The fraction part is [tex]\(\frac{2}{9}\)[/tex].
To convert the mixed number to an improper fraction:
[tex]\[ 3 \frac{2}{9} = \frac{3 \times 9 + 2}{9} = \frac{27 + 2}{9} = \frac{29}{9} \][/tex]
2. Convert the improper fraction [tex]\(\frac{29}{9}\)[/tex] to a decimal:
[tex]\[ \frac{29}{9} \approx 3.2222\ldots \][/tex]
This is a repeating decimal, so it can be written as [tex]\(3.2\overline{2}\)[/tex].
Now we look at the provided numbers and see which ones are equivalent to 3.2\overline{2} (or [tex]\(\frac{29}{9}\)[/tex]):
- [tex]\(\frac{29}{9}\)[/tex]: This fraction calculates as follows:
[tex]\[ \frac{29}{9} = 3.2222\overline{2} \][/tex]
This matches exactly with our calculated decimal value.
- [tex]\(32\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(32\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(322\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(322\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(0.2\%\)[/tex]: This is [tex]\(0.2\)[/tex] percent, which can be converted to a decimal:
[tex]\[ 0.2\% = \frac{0.2}{100} = 0.002 \][/tex]
This is not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(329\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(329\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(32978\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(32978\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(\frac{6}{9}\)[/tex]: As a decimal:
[tex]\[ \frac{6}{9} = 0.666\overline{6} \][/tex]
This is not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(32.322\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(32.322\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(32970\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(32970\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
Given the analysis above, the number from the provided list that is equivalent to [tex]\(3 \frac{2}{9}\)[/tex] or [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\frac{29}{9}} \][/tex]
1. Convert [tex]\(3 \frac{2}{9}\)[/tex] to an improper fraction:
- The whole number part is 3.
- The fraction part is [tex]\(\frac{2}{9}\)[/tex].
To convert the mixed number to an improper fraction:
[tex]\[ 3 \frac{2}{9} = \frac{3 \times 9 + 2}{9} = \frac{27 + 2}{9} = \frac{29}{9} \][/tex]
2. Convert the improper fraction [tex]\(\frac{29}{9}\)[/tex] to a decimal:
[tex]\[ \frac{29}{9} \approx 3.2222\ldots \][/tex]
This is a repeating decimal, so it can be written as [tex]\(3.2\overline{2}\)[/tex].
Now we look at the provided numbers and see which ones are equivalent to 3.2\overline{2} (or [tex]\(\frac{29}{9}\)[/tex]):
- [tex]\(\frac{29}{9}\)[/tex]: This fraction calculates as follows:
[tex]\[ \frac{29}{9} = 3.2222\overline{2} \][/tex]
This matches exactly with our calculated decimal value.
- [tex]\(32\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(32\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(322\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(322\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(0.2\%\)[/tex]: This is [tex]\(0.2\)[/tex] percent, which can be converted to a decimal:
[tex]\[ 0.2\% = \frac{0.2}{100} = 0.002 \][/tex]
This is not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(329\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(329\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(32978\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(32978\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(\frac{6}{9}\)[/tex]: As a decimal:
[tex]\[ \frac{6}{9} = 0.666\overline{6} \][/tex]
This is not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(32.322\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(32.322\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(32970\)[/tex]: As a decimal value, [tex]\(32970\)[/tex] is clearly not equivalent to [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex].
Given the analysis above, the number from the provided list that is equivalent to [tex]\(3 \frac{2}{9}\)[/tex] or [tex]\(3.2222\overline{2}\)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\frac{29}{9}} \][/tex]
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.