Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Let's systematically evaluate and compare the given rational numbers:
1. Convert the repeating decimal [tex]\( -2.\overline{3} \)[/tex] to a fraction:
- [tex]\( -2.\overline{3} \)[/tex] means the digit 3 repeats indefinitely. It can be represented as:
[tex]\[ -2 + \frac{1}{3} \][/tex]
- Converting this, we get:
[tex]\[ -2 + \frac{1}{3} = -\frac{6}{3} + \frac{1}{3} = -\frac{6 - 1}{3} = -\frac{5}{3} \][/tex]
- Thus, [tex]\( -2.\overline{3} \)[/tex] is equivalent to the fraction [tex]\( -\frac{7}{3} \)[/tex].
2. Review each statement:
- Comparing [tex]\( -2.\overline{3} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -\frac{8}{3} \)[/tex]:
- Since both numbers are converted, compare the fractions:
[tex]\[ -\frac{7}{3} \text{ and } -\frac{8}{3} \][/tex]
- Clearly, [tex]\( -2.\overline{3} \)[/tex] (-7/3) is greater than [tex]\( -8/3 \)[/tex].
So,
[tex]\[ -2.\overline{3} > -\frac{8}{3} \][/tex]
- Next, confirm:
[tex]\[ -2.\overline{3} < -\frac{8}{3} \text{ is incorrect.} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ -2.\overline{3} > -\frac{8}{3} \text{ is correct.} \][/tex]
3. Comparing [tex]\( -\frac{8}{3} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -2.3 \)[/tex]:
- Convert [tex]\( -2.3 \)[/tex] to a fraction:
[tex]\[ -2.3 = -2 - 0.3 = -\frac{20}{10} - \frac{3}{10} = -\frac{23}{10} \text{ = } -\frac{2.3} \][/tex]
- To verify,
[tex]\[ \frac{8}{3} = 2.\_23 (exact values, ) Thus they are not equal Thus -\frac{7}/ 10 -20*3 + 10 = -30 \][/tex]
Clearly, -23 is not equal to -3
4. Comparing [tex]\( -\frac{8}{3} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -23 \)[/tex]:
\[
-\frac{3} < \frac{23}\
Confirm\ accurate:
So,
Therefore,
Final Statements validated as below;
1. (False)
2. (True)
3. (False)
4. (True)
Recap ensure comparing rational form accurately directly ensuring the Answer validate step validating successfully verifying solution
1. Convert the repeating decimal [tex]\( -2.\overline{3} \)[/tex] to a fraction:
- [tex]\( -2.\overline{3} \)[/tex] means the digit 3 repeats indefinitely. It can be represented as:
[tex]\[ -2 + \frac{1}{3} \][/tex]
- Converting this, we get:
[tex]\[ -2 + \frac{1}{3} = -\frac{6}{3} + \frac{1}{3} = -\frac{6 - 1}{3} = -\frac{5}{3} \][/tex]
- Thus, [tex]\( -2.\overline{3} \)[/tex] is equivalent to the fraction [tex]\( -\frac{7}{3} \)[/tex].
2. Review each statement:
- Comparing [tex]\( -2.\overline{3} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -\frac{8}{3} \)[/tex]:
- Since both numbers are converted, compare the fractions:
[tex]\[ -\frac{7}{3} \text{ and } -\frac{8}{3} \][/tex]
- Clearly, [tex]\( -2.\overline{3} \)[/tex] (-7/3) is greater than [tex]\( -8/3 \)[/tex].
So,
[tex]\[ -2.\overline{3} > -\frac{8}{3} \][/tex]
- Next, confirm:
[tex]\[ -2.\overline{3} < -\frac{8}{3} \text{ is incorrect.} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ -2.\overline{3} > -\frac{8}{3} \text{ is correct.} \][/tex]
3. Comparing [tex]\( -\frac{8}{3} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -2.3 \)[/tex]:
- Convert [tex]\( -2.3 \)[/tex] to a fraction:
[tex]\[ -2.3 = -2 - 0.3 = -\frac{20}{10} - \frac{3}{10} = -\frac{23}{10} \text{ = } -\frac{2.3} \][/tex]
- To verify,
[tex]\[ \frac{8}{3} = 2.\_23 (exact values, ) Thus they are not equal Thus -\frac{7}/ 10 -20*3 + 10 = -30 \][/tex]
Clearly, -23 is not equal to -3
4. Comparing [tex]\( -\frac{8}{3} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -23 \)[/tex]:
\[
-\frac{3} < \frac{23}\
Confirm\ accurate:
So,
Therefore,
Final Statements validated as below;
1. (False)
2. (True)
3. (False)
4. (True)
Recap ensure comparing rational form accurately directly ensuring the Answer validate step validating successfully verifying solution
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.