At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine which exponential function models the data given in the table, let's examine the account values over the time period and compare them to the provided exponential function candidates.
We are given the following data points for the account value over time:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text{Time (years)} & \text{Account Value (\$)} \\ \hline 0 & 400 \\ \hline 1 & 436 \\ \hline 2 & 468 \\ \hline 3 & 502 \\ \hline 4 & 550 \\ \hline 5 & 589 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
We'll compare these data points to each candidate exponential function to see which one fits:
1. [tex]\( f(x) = 1.41 \cdot (30.69)^x \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( f(x) = 37.74 \cdot (396.48)^x \)[/tex]
3. [tex]\( f(x) = 390.60 \cdot (1.41)^x \)[/tex]
4. [tex]\( f(x) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^x \)[/tex]
For each candidate function, we substitute [tex]\( x \)[/tex] with the time values from 0 to 5 and compare the resulting values to the account values given.
Let's check if these functions match the data points:
- [tex]\( f(x) = 1.41 \cdot (30.69)^x \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 1.41 \cdot (30.69)^0 = 1.41 \)[/tex]
- This does not match the initial account value of 400.
- [tex]\( f(x) = 37.74 \cdot (396.48)^x \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 37.74 \cdot (396.48)^0 = 37.74 \)[/tex]
- This does not match the initial account value of 400.
- [tex]\( f(x) = 390.60 \cdot (1.41)^x \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 390.60 \cdot (1.41)^0 = 390.60 \)[/tex]
- This is close but does not exactly match the initial account value of 400. Checking further might show divergences.
- [tex]\( f(x) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^x \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^0 = 401.19 \)[/tex]
- This closely matches the initial account value of 400. Checking more values:
- [tex]\( f(1) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^1 = 401.19 \cdot 1.08 \approx 433.29 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(2) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^2 \approx 467.95 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(3) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^3 \approx 504.39 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(4) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^4 \approx 543.86 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(5) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^5 \approx 587.37 \)[/tex]
These values closely match the provided account values when rounded to the nearest hundredth and are closer than any other function candidate. Thus, the exponential function that models the data is:
[tex]\[ f(x) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^x \][/tex]
We are given the following data points for the account value over time:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text{Time (years)} & \text{Account Value (\$)} \\ \hline 0 & 400 \\ \hline 1 & 436 \\ \hline 2 & 468 \\ \hline 3 & 502 \\ \hline 4 & 550 \\ \hline 5 & 589 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
We'll compare these data points to each candidate exponential function to see which one fits:
1. [tex]\( f(x) = 1.41 \cdot (30.69)^x \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( f(x) = 37.74 \cdot (396.48)^x \)[/tex]
3. [tex]\( f(x) = 390.60 \cdot (1.41)^x \)[/tex]
4. [tex]\( f(x) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^x \)[/tex]
For each candidate function, we substitute [tex]\( x \)[/tex] with the time values from 0 to 5 and compare the resulting values to the account values given.
Let's check if these functions match the data points:
- [tex]\( f(x) = 1.41 \cdot (30.69)^x \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 1.41 \cdot (30.69)^0 = 1.41 \)[/tex]
- This does not match the initial account value of 400.
- [tex]\( f(x) = 37.74 \cdot (396.48)^x \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 37.74 \cdot (396.48)^0 = 37.74 \)[/tex]
- This does not match the initial account value of 400.
- [tex]\( f(x) = 390.60 \cdot (1.41)^x \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 390.60 \cdot (1.41)^0 = 390.60 \)[/tex]
- This is close but does not exactly match the initial account value of 400. Checking further might show divergences.
- [tex]\( f(x) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^x \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^0 = 401.19 \)[/tex]
- This closely matches the initial account value of 400. Checking more values:
- [tex]\( f(1) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^1 = 401.19 \cdot 1.08 \approx 433.29 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(2) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^2 \approx 467.95 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(3) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^3 \approx 504.39 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(4) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^4 \approx 543.86 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(5) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^5 \approx 587.37 \)[/tex]
These values closely match the provided account values when rounded to the nearest hundredth and are closer than any other function candidate. Thus, the exponential function that models the data is:
[tex]\[ f(x) = 401.19 \cdot (1.08)^x \][/tex]
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.