Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To solve the problem, we will use logical reasoning based on the transitive property of implication.
The transitive property of implication states that if [tex]\( x \Rightarrow y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \Rightarrow z \)[/tex] are both true, then [tex]\( x \Rightarrow z \)[/tex] must also be true.
Let's analyze the given statements one by one:
A. [tex]\(\neg x \Rightarrow \neg z\)[/tex]:
- The statement suggests that if [tex]\( x \)[/tex] is false, then [tex]\( z \)[/tex] must also be false.
- This does not necessarily follow from the given premises [tex]\( x \Rightarrow y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \Rightarrow z \)[/tex].
B. [tex]\( x \Rightarrow z \)[/tex]:
- The statement suggests that if [tex]\( x \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( z \)[/tex] must also be true.
- This is directly supported by the transitive property of implications since [tex]\( x \Rightarrow y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \Rightarrow z \)[/tex], hence [tex]\( x \Rightarrow z \)[/tex] must be true.
C. [tex]\( \neg x \Rightarrow z \)[/tex]:
- The statement suggests that if [tex]\( x \)[/tex] is false, then [tex]\( z \)[/tex] must be true.
- There is no implication rule that directly supports this statement from [tex]\( x \Rightarrow y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \Rightarrow z \)[/tex].
D. [tex]\( z \Rightarrow x \)[/tex]:
- The statement suggests that if [tex]\( z \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( x \)[/tex] must also be true.
- There is no implication rule that supports this reversal of the initial implications.
By considering the transitive property of implication, the only statement that must be true given [tex]\( x \Rightarrow y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \Rightarrow z \)[/tex] is:
B. [tex]\( x \Rightarrow z \)[/tex].
The transitive property of implication states that if [tex]\( x \Rightarrow y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \Rightarrow z \)[/tex] are both true, then [tex]\( x \Rightarrow z \)[/tex] must also be true.
Let's analyze the given statements one by one:
A. [tex]\(\neg x \Rightarrow \neg z\)[/tex]:
- The statement suggests that if [tex]\( x \)[/tex] is false, then [tex]\( z \)[/tex] must also be false.
- This does not necessarily follow from the given premises [tex]\( x \Rightarrow y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \Rightarrow z \)[/tex].
B. [tex]\( x \Rightarrow z \)[/tex]:
- The statement suggests that if [tex]\( x \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( z \)[/tex] must also be true.
- This is directly supported by the transitive property of implications since [tex]\( x \Rightarrow y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \Rightarrow z \)[/tex], hence [tex]\( x \Rightarrow z \)[/tex] must be true.
C. [tex]\( \neg x \Rightarrow z \)[/tex]:
- The statement suggests that if [tex]\( x \)[/tex] is false, then [tex]\( z \)[/tex] must be true.
- There is no implication rule that directly supports this statement from [tex]\( x \Rightarrow y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \Rightarrow z \)[/tex].
D. [tex]\( z \Rightarrow x \)[/tex]:
- The statement suggests that if [tex]\( z \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( x \)[/tex] must also be true.
- There is no implication rule that supports this reversal of the initial implications.
By considering the transitive property of implication, the only statement that must be true given [tex]\( x \Rightarrow y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( y \Rightarrow z \)[/tex] is:
B. [tex]\( x \Rightarrow z \)[/tex].
We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.