Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

For which pair of functions is the exponential consistently growing at a faster rate than the quadratic over the interval [tex]$0 \leq x \leq 5$[/tex]?

A. [tex]f(x) = 2^x[/tex] and [tex]g(x) = x^2[/tex]
B. [tex]f(x) = 3^x[/tex] and [tex]g(x) = x^2 + 1[/tex]
C. [tex]f(x) = e^x[/tex] and [tex]g(x) = 2x^2[/tex]
D. [tex]f(x) = 2^x[/tex] and [tex]g(x) = 3x^2[/tex]


Sagot :

Let's consider the pair of functions [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) = e^x \)[/tex] over the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].

We want to determine the points at which the exponential function [tex]\( g(x) = e^x \)[/tex] grows faster than the quadratic function [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex]. In other words, we need to find the points where [tex]\( e^x \)[/tex] is greater than [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex].

First, we need to evaluate both functions over the given interval. By examining the values of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] from [tex]\( 0 \)[/tex] to [tex]\( 5 \)[/tex]:

- At [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = 0^2 = 0 \quad \text{and} \quad g(0) = e^0 = 1 \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( 1 > 0 \)[/tex].

- At [tex]\( x = 0.05 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0.05) \approx 0.00255 \quad \text{and} \quad g(0.05) \approx 1.05 \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( 1.05 > 0.00255 \)[/tex].

- At [tex]\( x = 0.10 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0.10) \approx 0.0102 \quad \text{and} \quad g(0.10) \approx 1.11 \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( 1.11 > 0.0102 \)[/tex].

Continuing this evaluation for several points within the interval, we observe:
- At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(1) = 1 \quad \text{and} \quad g(1) = e \approx 2.72 \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( 2.72 > 1 \)[/tex].

- At [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(2) = 4 \quad \text{and} \quad g(2) \approx 7.39 \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( 7.39 > 4 \)[/tex].

- At [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(3) = 9 \quad \text{and} \quad g(3) \approx 20.09 \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( 20.09 > 9 \)[/tex].

- At [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(4) = 16 \quad \text{and} \quad g(4) \approx 54.60 \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( 54.60 > 16 \)[/tex].

- At [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(5) = 25 \quad \text{and} \quad g(5) \approx 148.41 \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( 148.41 > 25 \)[/tex].

By examining these values, we see a consistent pattern:

For all [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex], the values of [tex]\( g(x) = e^x \)[/tex] are greater than the values of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex]. Hence, the exponential function [tex]\( g(x) = e^x \)[/tex] is consistently growing at a faster rate than the quadratic function [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] over the entire interval [tex]\( 0 \leq x \leq 5 \)[/tex].