Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding quick and accurate answers to your questions from professionals on our platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Janice measured the mass and the volume of an object. She then determined the density of the object by dividing the object's mass by its volume ([tex]$D=\frac{m}{v}$[/tex]).

Which value would most likely represent the density of the object?

A. [tex]$-1 \, \text{g/cm}^3$[/tex]
B. [tex][tex]$4 \, \text{m/s}$[/tex][/tex]
C. [tex]$-3 \, \text{m/s}$[/tex]
D. [tex]$6 \, \text{g/cm}^3$[/tex]


Sagot :

Let's analyze the given values to determine which one most likely represents the density of the object.

1. [tex]$-1 \, g/cm^3$[/tex]:
- Density is a measure of mass per unit volume, and it cannot be negative. Thus, [tex]$-1 \, g/cm^3$[/tex] does not make physical sense for density.

2. [tex]$4 \, m/s$[/tex]:
- The units here are meters per second (m/s), which is a measure of speed, not density. Therefore, this value does not represent density.

3. [tex]$-3 \, m/s$[/tex]:
- Similar to the previous value, [tex]$-3 \, m/s$[/tex] measures speed with negative value, which is invalid in this context for density. Thus, it doesn't represent density.

4. [tex]$6 \, g/cm^3$[/tex]:
- This value has the appropriate units of grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm^3), which are the correct units for density. Moreover, it is a positive value, consistent with the physical nature of density.

Among all the provided values, the one that most logically and accurately represents the density of the object is:

[tex]\[ 6 \, g/cm^3 \][/tex]