Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

Janice measured the mass and the volume of an object. She then determined the density of the object by dividing the object's mass by its volume ([tex]$D=\frac{m}{v}$[/tex]).

Which value would most likely represent the density of the object?

A. [tex]$-1 \, \text{g/cm}^3$[/tex]
B. [tex][tex]$4 \, \text{m/s}$[/tex][/tex]
C. [tex]$-3 \, \text{m/s}$[/tex]
D. [tex]$6 \, \text{g/cm}^3$[/tex]

Sagot :

Let's analyze the given values to determine which one most likely represents the density of the object.

1. [tex]$-1 \, g/cm^3$[/tex]:
- Density is a measure of mass per unit volume, and it cannot be negative. Thus, [tex]$-1 \, g/cm^3$[/tex] does not make physical sense for density.

2. [tex]$4 \, m/s$[/tex]:
- The units here are meters per second (m/s), which is a measure of speed, not density. Therefore, this value does not represent density.

3. [tex]$-3 \, m/s$[/tex]:
- Similar to the previous value, [tex]$-3 \, m/s$[/tex] measures speed with negative value, which is invalid in this context for density. Thus, it doesn't represent density.

4. [tex]$6 \, g/cm^3$[/tex]:
- This value has the appropriate units of grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm^3), which are the correct units for density. Moreover, it is a positive value, consistent with the physical nature of density.

Among all the provided values, the one that most logically and accurately represents the density of the object is:

[tex]\[ 6 \, g/cm^3 \][/tex]