Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding quick and accurate answers to your questions from professionals on our platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Let's analyze Riko's method and then find the correct distance using the appropriate formula.
Riko calculated the distance by adding the absolute values of the y-coordinates:
[tex]\[ |-3| + |-5| = 3 + 5 = 8 \][/tex]
Riko's method is incorrect. He mistakenly added the absolute values of the y-coordinates, which does not give the correct distance between two points. Instead, the distance between two points [tex]\((x_1, y_1)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((x_2, y_2)\)[/tex] in the coordinate plane should be calculated using the distance formula:
[tex]\[ \text{Distance} = \sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2} \][/tex]
Let’s apply the distance formula to the points [tex]\((-2, -3)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((2, -5)\)[/tex]:
1. Calculate the difference in the x-coordinates:
[tex]\[ x_2 - x_1 = 2 - (-2) = 2 + 2 = 4 \][/tex]
2. Calculate the difference in the y-coordinates:
[tex]\[ y_2 - y_1 = -5 - (-3) = -5 + 3 = -2 \][/tex]
3. Square these differences:
[tex]\[ (x_2 - x_1)^2 = 4^2 = 16 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (y_2 - y_1)^2 = (-2)^2 = 4 \][/tex]
4. Add the squares of the differences:
[tex]\[ (x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2 = 16 + 4 = 20 \][/tex]
5. Take the square root of the sum:
[tex]\[ \text{Distance} = \sqrt{20} = \sqrt{4 \cdot 5} = 2\sqrt{5} \approx 4.472 \][/tex]
Thus, the correct distance between the points (-2, -3) and (2, -5) is approximately [tex]\(4.472\)[/tex] units.
In conclusion, Riko is incorrect because he did not use the distance formula. He added the absolute values of the y-coordinates instead of calculating the actual Euclidean distance. The correct distance is approximately [tex]\(4.472\)[/tex] units.
Riko calculated the distance by adding the absolute values of the y-coordinates:
[tex]\[ |-3| + |-5| = 3 + 5 = 8 \][/tex]
Riko's method is incorrect. He mistakenly added the absolute values of the y-coordinates, which does not give the correct distance between two points. Instead, the distance between two points [tex]\((x_1, y_1)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((x_2, y_2)\)[/tex] in the coordinate plane should be calculated using the distance formula:
[tex]\[ \text{Distance} = \sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2} \][/tex]
Let’s apply the distance formula to the points [tex]\((-2, -3)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((2, -5)\)[/tex]:
1. Calculate the difference in the x-coordinates:
[tex]\[ x_2 - x_1 = 2 - (-2) = 2 + 2 = 4 \][/tex]
2. Calculate the difference in the y-coordinates:
[tex]\[ y_2 - y_1 = -5 - (-3) = -5 + 3 = -2 \][/tex]
3. Square these differences:
[tex]\[ (x_2 - x_1)^2 = 4^2 = 16 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (y_2 - y_1)^2 = (-2)^2 = 4 \][/tex]
4. Add the squares of the differences:
[tex]\[ (x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2 = 16 + 4 = 20 \][/tex]
5. Take the square root of the sum:
[tex]\[ \text{Distance} = \sqrt{20} = \sqrt{4 \cdot 5} = 2\sqrt{5} \approx 4.472 \][/tex]
Thus, the correct distance between the points (-2, -3) and (2, -5) is approximately [tex]\(4.472\)[/tex] units.
In conclusion, Riko is incorrect because he did not use the distance formula. He added the absolute values of the y-coordinates instead of calculating the actual Euclidean distance. The correct distance is approximately [tex]\(4.472\)[/tex] units.
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.