Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where experts provide clear and concise information on various topics. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals on our platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Let's analyze Riko's method and then find the correct distance using the appropriate formula.
Riko calculated the distance by adding the absolute values of the y-coordinates:
[tex]\[ |-3| + |-5| = 3 + 5 = 8 \][/tex]
Riko's method is incorrect. He mistakenly added the absolute values of the y-coordinates, which does not give the correct distance between two points. Instead, the distance between two points [tex]\((x_1, y_1)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((x_2, y_2)\)[/tex] in the coordinate plane should be calculated using the distance formula:
[tex]\[ \text{Distance} = \sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2} \][/tex]
Let’s apply the distance formula to the points [tex]\((-2, -3)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((2, -5)\)[/tex]:
1. Calculate the difference in the x-coordinates:
[tex]\[ x_2 - x_1 = 2 - (-2) = 2 + 2 = 4 \][/tex]
2. Calculate the difference in the y-coordinates:
[tex]\[ y_2 - y_1 = -5 - (-3) = -5 + 3 = -2 \][/tex]
3. Square these differences:
[tex]\[ (x_2 - x_1)^2 = 4^2 = 16 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (y_2 - y_1)^2 = (-2)^2 = 4 \][/tex]
4. Add the squares of the differences:
[tex]\[ (x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2 = 16 + 4 = 20 \][/tex]
5. Take the square root of the sum:
[tex]\[ \text{Distance} = \sqrt{20} = \sqrt{4 \cdot 5} = 2\sqrt{5} \approx 4.472 \][/tex]
Thus, the correct distance between the points (-2, -3) and (2, -5) is approximately [tex]\(4.472\)[/tex] units.
In conclusion, Riko is incorrect because he did not use the distance formula. He added the absolute values of the y-coordinates instead of calculating the actual Euclidean distance. The correct distance is approximately [tex]\(4.472\)[/tex] units.
Riko calculated the distance by adding the absolute values of the y-coordinates:
[tex]\[ |-3| + |-5| = 3 + 5 = 8 \][/tex]
Riko's method is incorrect. He mistakenly added the absolute values of the y-coordinates, which does not give the correct distance between two points. Instead, the distance between two points [tex]\((x_1, y_1)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((x_2, y_2)\)[/tex] in the coordinate plane should be calculated using the distance formula:
[tex]\[ \text{Distance} = \sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2} \][/tex]
Let’s apply the distance formula to the points [tex]\((-2, -3)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((2, -5)\)[/tex]:
1. Calculate the difference in the x-coordinates:
[tex]\[ x_2 - x_1 = 2 - (-2) = 2 + 2 = 4 \][/tex]
2. Calculate the difference in the y-coordinates:
[tex]\[ y_2 - y_1 = -5 - (-3) = -5 + 3 = -2 \][/tex]
3. Square these differences:
[tex]\[ (x_2 - x_1)^2 = 4^2 = 16 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (y_2 - y_1)^2 = (-2)^2 = 4 \][/tex]
4. Add the squares of the differences:
[tex]\[ (x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2 = 16 + 4 = 20 \][/tex]
5. Take the square root of the sum:
[tex]\[ \text{Distance} = \sqrt{20} = \sqrt{4 \cdot 5} = 2\sqrt{5} \approx 4.472 \][/tex]
Thus, the correct distance between the points (-2, -3) and (2, -5) is approximately [tex]\(4.472\)[/tex] units.
In conclusion, Riko is incorrect because he did not use the distance formula. He added the absolute values of the y-coordinates instead of calculating the actual Euclidean distance. The correct distance is approximately [tex]\(4.472\)[/tex] units.
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.