Answered

Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

Which case held that an encounter would be deemed consensual if a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline the officers' requests or otherwise terminate the encounter?

A. People v. Cartwright
B. US v. Drayton
C. Florida v. Bostick (1991)

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In legal contexts, consensual encounters with law enforcement are defined by the suspect's ability to end the interaction, exemplified by the Florida v. Bostick case and guidelines set in Terry v. Ohio.


Explanation:

Consensual encounters with law enforcement are characterized by the notion that a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline officers' requests or end the encounter.

In Florida v. Bostick (1991), the Supreme Court held that if a person feels free to terminate the encounter with police, it can be deemed consensual, even if in a police-citizen interaction.

Similarly, Terry v. Ohio (1968) established guidelines for police stops based on reasonable suspicion, offering insight into lawful encounters between individuals and law enforcement.


Learn more about Legal Consent and Police Encounters here:

https://brainly.com/question/33903563


Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.