Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Which case held that an encounter would be deemed consensual if a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline the officers' requests or otherwise terminate the encounter?

A. People v. Cartwright
B. US v. Drayton
C. Florida v. Bostick (1991)

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In legal contexts, consensual encounters with law enforcement are defined by the suspect's ability to end the interaction, exemplified by the Florida v. Bostick case and guidelines set in Terry v. Ohio.


Explanation:

Consensual encounters with law enforcement are characterized by the notion that a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline officers' requests or end the encounter.

In Florida v. Bostick (1991), the Supreme Court held that if a person feels free to terminate the encounter with police, it can be deemed consensual, even if in a police-citizen interaction.

Similarly, Terry v. Ohio (1968) established guidelines for police stops based on reasonable suspicion, offering insight into lawful encounters between individuals and law enforcement.


Learn more about Legal Consent and Police Encounters here:

https://brainly.com/question/33903563


We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.