Answered

Discover a wealth of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts provide answers to your most pressing questions. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

Which case held that an encounter would be deemed consensual if a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline the officers' requests or otherwise terminate the encounter?

A. People v. Cartwright
B. US v. Drayton
C. Florida v. Bostick (1991)

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In legal contexts, consensual encounters with law enforcement are defined by the suspect's ability to end the interaction, exemplified by the Florida v. Bostick case and guidelines set in Terry v. Ohio.


Explanation:

Consensual encounters with law enforcement are characterized by the notion that a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline officers' requests or end the encounter.

In Florida v. Bostick (1991), the Supreme Court held that if a person feels free to terminate the encounter with police, it can be deemed consensual, even if in a police-citizen interaction.

Similarly, Terry v. Ohio (1968) established guidelines for police stops based on reasonable suspicion, offering insight into lawful encounters between individuals and law enforcement.


Learn more about Legal Consent and Police Encounters here:

https://brainly.com/question/33903563


Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.